MHB What are some common traps to watch out for in word problems?

DeusAbscondus
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Hi folks could someone please check my calculations contained in attached file?
thanks.

(incidentally, how can i create a link to such files in the future, weaving them into my text?)

Deus(has gone)
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: exponential decay problem

Yes, it is correct, if $t$ represents hours (it is not made clear in the problem what the unit of $t$ is). For instance, if $t$ was in minutes, then you need to substitute $t = 4 \times 60 = 240$. I think it is meant to be hours though.

Be careful what each symbol means. For instance, in the first question, it says "500kg of raw sugar has been refined to 380kg". Does that mean that there is 380kg of raw sugar remaining, and that there is 500 - 380 = 120kg of refined sugar, or the opposite? Or something else? (sorry, I am not familiar with sugar refining) This will affect the meaning of (and answers to) the questions.

In word problems the hardest part is often (at least to me) understanding what the problem is and converting it to math. They often have little traps built-in to confuse people and make them pay attention to wording, it can be frustrating actually.​
 
Last edited:
Re: exponential decay problem

Thanks Bacterius,
Worked out where I was reading the question wrong.
But it helped - as always - to have another set of eyes look at my work.

Cheers mate,
D'Abs
Bacterius said:
Yes, it is correct, if $t$ represents hours (it is not made clear in the problem what the unit of $t$ is). For instance, if $t$ was in minutes, then you need to substitute $t = 4 \times 60 = 240$. I think it is meant to be hours though.

Be careful what each symbol means. For instance, in the first question, it says "500kg of raw sugar has been refined to 380kg". Does that mean that there is 380kg of raw sugar remaining, and that there is 500 - 380 = 120kg of refined sugar, or the opposite? Or something else? (sorry, I am not familiar with sugar refining) This will affect the meaning of (and answers to) the questions.

In word problems the hardest part is often (at least to me) understanding what the problem is and converting it to math. They often have little traps built-in to confuse people and make them pay attention to wording, it can be frustrating actually.​
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top