What are the basic mechanics of pulsar IGR J1104-6103?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bernie G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Pulsar
AI Thread Summary
IGR J11014-6103 is notable for having the largest observed jet in the Milky Way, with a jet length of approximately 37 light-years and a speed of around 0.8 times the speed of light. The neutron star is moving at a velocity between 0.001 and 0.003 times the speed of light and is estimated to be about 60 light-years from the center of the associated cloud. The explosion that created this pulsar occurred roughly 15,000 years ago. Interestingly, the pulsar does not have an accretion disk, resembling an overweight runaway neutron star due to an off-center explosion. The jets are primarily detected in X-rays, with no accompanying radio signature, raising questions about their mechanics.
Bernie G
Messages
330
Reaction score
13
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IGR_J11014-6103#/media/File:Lighthouse_nebula.jpg

IGR J11014-6103 has the largest observed jet in the Milky Way. What are the basic mechanics IGR J11014-6103?: How fast is this neutron star pulsar moving with respect to the center of the cloud (1000 km/s?) and how far is the neutron star from the cloud center (60 ly?) Age of the explosion (15,000 years ago?) Length of jet (big part - 37 ly?) ? Speed of the jet (0.8c)? Are these 5 numbers consistent? Is there a technique to measure its mass?
 

Attachments

  • Lighthouse_nebula.jpg
    Lighthouse_nebula.jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 516
  • Lighthouse_nebula.jpg
    Lighthouse_nebula.jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 490
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The pulsar's speed is reported between 0.001 - 0.003c.
"One of the biggest mysteries is that we only see these jets in x-rays, there's no radio signature.":
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2014/02/19/3948039.htm

This "neutron" star doesn't have an accretion disk. It looks like an almost-black hole that due to an off-center explosion became instead an overweight runaway neutron star.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Back
Top