What Are the Best Game Theory Resources for Beginners and Non-Scientists?

SuperNatural
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello there Ph.D's and not-yet-PhDs ...

Just "discovered" game theory for myself today and am interested in finding websites, books, and professional journals that meet your high standards. I'm a beginner in game theory, and I'm not a scientist, but I do read the Journal of Memetics, Journal of Psychology, Nature for fun so I'm familiar with technical terminology.

So thank you for your responses in advance..

:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not necessarily a "bump", but I'd definitely like to hear what people (specifically mathematicians) think of game theory. I'm a double major in mathematics and economics, and so I thought game theory would be right up my alley. Alas, I found it boring once I picked up some books. Maybe I need a good professor. Maybe I need to learn topology. *shrugs*

So, anyone? :)
 
Here's three books to start. Tehy're all from Dover (www.doverpublications.com), so they're cheap.
1.Games and Decisions by Luce and Raiffa.
2. Game Theory, a nontechnical introduction, by Davis.
3. Games, Theory and Applications, by Thomas.

The first two are non mathematical, and the third one requires a little matrix theory.
 
selfAdjoint said:
Here's three books to start. Tehy're all from Dover (www.doverpublications.com), so they're cheap.
1.Games and Decisions by Luce and Raiffa.
2. Game Theory, a nontechnical introduction, by Davis.
3. Games, Theory and Applications, by Thomas.

The first two are non mathematical, and the third one requires a little matrix theory.


Thanks for the recommendations.. :smile:

I'm still learning about this myself and I will post questions or ideas when I think of them.
 
"Essays on Game Theory" - By John F. Nash

I too have gained some interest in this area of Mathematics. I have not read the book I recommended you. However I am ultimately sure that the book will give a great learning experience for you, since the author of the Book is a great genius.
 
Last edited:
The learning experience does not depend on the genius who wrote some essays but on the match between the initial level of the book and the reader's expertise, imho.
- Unless the reader is a great genius.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top