What Are the Differences in Line Integrals Using Different Coordinate Systems?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences in evaluating line integrals using various coordinate systems, specifically focusing on a closed circular path in the xy-plane. Participants explore the implications of using polar coordinates versus rectangular coordinates in the context of line integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a line integral around a circular path using polar coordinates, yielding a result of \(2\pi b\).
  • The same participant attempts to evaluate the integral using rectangular coordinates and finds a result of \(0\), questioning the correctness of their approach.
  • Another participant suggests that the mistake lies in treating \(\hat{\phi}\) as a constant vector, emphasizing that \(\hat{\phi}\) varies with \(\phi\) and cannot be factored out of the integral.
  • A later reply reinforces the idea that transforming vectors into Cartesian coordinates is necessary to maintain a constant direction in the context of line integrals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of the vector \(\hat{\phi}\) in the integral, with some agreeing on the necessity of using rectangular coordinates while others emphasize the importance of understanding the nature of \(\hat{\phi}\). The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing approaches.

Contextual Notes

There is an underlying assumption that the participants are familiar with the concepts of line integrals and coordinate transformations. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in the integration process.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
I want to integrate around a closed circular path on xy plane around the origin. Say the radius is b. So

##\oint d\vec l## where ##d\vec l=\hat{\phi}b d\phi##

1) If I just use polar( or spherical or even cylindrical) coordinates. R=b and
\oint d\vec l\;=\;\hat{\phi}\int_0^{2\pi} b d\phi\;=\;2\pi b

2) Using rectangular co where ##\hat{\phi}=-\hat x \sin \phi +\hat y \cos \phi##
\oint d\vec l\;=\;b\int_0^{2\pi} (-\hat x \sin\phi+\hat y \cos \phi) d\phi\;=\;0

What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yungman said:
I want to integrate around a closed circular path on xy plane around the origin. Say the radius is b. So

##\oint d\vec l## where ##d\vec l=\hat{\phi}b d\phi##

1) If I just use polar( or spherical or even cylindrical) coordinates. R=b and
\oint d\vec l\;=\;\hat{\phi}\int_0^{2\pi} b d\phi\;=\;2\pi b
This is a common mistake when you are first learning these things so don't worry. What you did wrong was pull out the ##\hat\phi## from the ##d\phi## integral. ##\hat\phi## is not a constant vector like the standard cartesian basis vectors! You can't simply pull out ##\hat\phi## from the ##d\phi## integral because ##\hat\phi## varies as ##\phi## varies. What you did in (2) was the correct way to evaluate integrals in such coordinates. Cheers!
 
WannabeNewton said:
This is a common mistake when you are first learning these things so don't worry. What you did wrong was pull out the ##\hat\phi## from the ##d\phi## integral. ##\hat\phi## is not a constant vector like the standard cartesian basis vectors! You can't simply pull out ##\hat\phi## from the ##d\phi## integral because ##\hat\phi## varies as ##\phi## varies. What you did in (2) was the correct way to evaluate integrals in such coordinates. Cheers!

Thanks for the pointers. So this means we have to resolve down to a constant vector ( or whatever you call it) that have constant direction. WHICH in our common rectangular, cylindrical and spherical coordinates, we have NO CHOICE but have to transform the vector into x,y,z coordinates no matter what.
 
Yessiree
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K