What are the different equivalence principles and how are they related?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the three equivalence principles in physics: Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP), Einsteinian Equivalence Principle (EEP), and Strong Equivalence Principle (SEP). It is established that EEP and SEP can be derived from WEP, leading to confusion about their necessity. Schiff's conjecture posits that any self-consistent theory of gravity that incorporates WEP must also incorporate EEP, suggesting that Eötvös experiments provide empirical support for EEP. Furthermore, it is noted that General Relativity (GR) is the only metric theory that fully satisfies SEP, while other theories may predict violations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP)
  • Familiarity with the Einsteinian Equivalence Principle (EEP)
  • Knowledge of the Strong Equivalence Principle (SEP)
  • Basic grasp of General Relativity (GR) and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Schiff's conjecture in gravitational theories
  • Explore Eötvös experiments and their significance in validating EEP
  • Investigate the differences between metric theories of gravity and their predictions regarding SEP
  • Study the experimental evidence supporting the validity of SEP in General Relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of gravitational theory, and researchers interested in the foundations of General Relativity and the equivalence principles in gravity.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
In my studies about equivalence principle,I learned that there are three equivalence principles:Weak,Einsteinian and Strong equivalence principles.I'm just confused with them.Also looks like EEP and SEP can be derived from WEP making them seem superfluous.
Can someone explain clearly?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-4/

The WEP and EEP are described in section 2.1, and the SEP is described in 3.1.2.

Section 2.2.1: "Around 1960, Schiff conjectured that this kind of connection was a necessary feature of any self-consistent theory of gravity. More precisely, Schiff’s conjecture states that any complete, self-consistent theory of gravity that embodies WEP necessarily embodies EEP. In other words, the validity of WEP alone guarantees the validity of local Lorentz and position invariance, and thereby of EEP.

If Schiff’s conjecture is correct, then Eötvös experiments may be seen as the direct empirical foundation for EEP, hence for the interpretation of gravity as a curved-spacetime phenomenon. Of course, a rigorous proof of such a conjecture is impossible (indeed, some special counter-examples are known [204, 194, 62]), yet a number of powerful “plausibility” arguments can be formulated."

Section 3.1.2: "Empirically it has been found that almost every metric theory other than GR introduces auxiliary gravitational fields, either dynamical or prior geometric, and thus predicts violations of SEP at some level (here we ignore quantum-theory inspired modifications to GR involving “R2” terms). The one exception is Nordström’s 1913 conformally-flat scalar theory [195], which can be written purely in terms of the metric; the theory satisfies SEP, but unfortunately violates experiment by predicting no deflection of light. General relativity seems to be the only viable metric theory that embodies SEP completely. In Section 3.6, we shall discuss experimental evidence for the validity of SEP."
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
927
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K