A What Are the Dual Low Energy Limits of Superstring Theory?

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
Let's consider superstring theory on a 10 dimensional Minkowski background. And assume there is a D3-brane on which the open strings end and closed strings wander around freely in the background. I want to know, in what limit this gives a supergravity theory in which I can study it by using the brane's SEM tensor in the Einstein's equations to find the curved metric? And in what limit this gives a U(1) gauge theory?(Its easy to say the low energy limit, but how is it that there are two different low energy limits? How are these low energy limits derived from the full theory?)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really know this stuff, so I don't 100% vouch for the truth of what I'm about to say. But: if you work at energies below the string scale, you can consider just the massless modes of the strings, and you should get an effective theory which is a 10d supergravity coupled to a gauge field localized on a 4d defect in the 10d space-time. Space around the defect is puckered, just like the bowling-ball-on-a-trampoline image of curved space, and if the defect is heavy enough, the "throat" leading down to it is infinitely long. That means the defect becomes invisible to the 10d gravitons - they never reach it and so never interact with it. That is called the decoupling limit - the defect has decoupled from 10d supergravity, the brane has decoupled from the bulk - and in that specific situation, you are left with just the gauge theory. But away from that specific situation, the gauge fields on the brane will remain coupled with the gravitons in the bulk.
 
  • Like
Likes Spinnor
That much is explained in a lot of books and papers. But I need something more precise and specific.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top