What are the effects of a translation on a vector in R2?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of translation in R2, specifically the mapping L(x) = x + a, where a is a nonzero vector. It is established that this translation is not a linear transformation unless a equals zero. Participants emphasize the need for clarity in mathematical proofs and notation, suggesting that the problem should explicitly state the conditions under which translations are linear. The conversation also highlights the importance of using proper notation for vectors and matrices in mathematical discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces in R2
  • Knowledge of linear transformations and their properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation for vectors and matrices
  • Ability to illustrate geometric transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in vector spaces
  • Learn about geometric interpretations of translations in R2
  • Explore the implications of non-linear transformations in higher dimensions
  • Review mathematical notation conventions for vectors and matrices
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, mathematicians interested in vector transformations, and educators teaching concepts of linearity and translation in R2.

Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let a be a fixed nonzero vector in R2. A mapping of the form L(x) = x + a is called a
translation. Show that a translation is not a linear transformation. Illustrate geometrically the effect of a translation.

My work is in the photo below, can you check and see if I'm correct.

Also to show geometrically the effect of a translation, I just drew a vector being shifted a units.

Thanks

Higgenz



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



259hcsw.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should try to type your posts instead of posting a picture. Typed text is so much easier to read. If you want to type a matrix, you can do it like this:
$$\begin{bmatrix}a & b\\ c & d\end{bmatrix}$$ Hit the quote button next to my post to see how I did this. More information here.

The statement of the problem is a bit careless. There is a translation that's linear: the one with a=0. The problem should be asking you to prove one of the following statements:

1. If L is a translation by ##a## and ##a\neq 0##, then L is not linear.
2. If L is a translation by ##a## and L is linear, then a=0.

The calculation you're doing is fine, but since you're just showing the calculation, and not including any "for all" or "there exists" statements, it's not clear what you're proving. If you decide to prove statement 1 above, you need to think about what exactly "L is not linear" means.

Also, I think you should change the notation so that the components of u are denoted by ##u_1## and ##u_2##, and similarly for the other variables.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K