What are the effects of different tensions in a rope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter delve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the effects of varying tension in a rope, particularly in the context of calculating wave speed using the equation v=sqrt(F/μ). The tension at both ends of a vertical rope differs due to the weight at the bottom, complicating the application of the equation. It is clarified that while tension is often assumed to be uniform, it actually varies along the length of the rope. To address this, one can analyze the tension for small segments of the rope, treating each segment as having negligible mass. This approach allows for a more accurate understanding of tension distribution throughout the rope.
delve
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm having some trouble with an equation: v=sqrt(F/μ). If I understand correctly, F corresponds to the tension in both ends of the rope. I'm calculating the wave speed for a vertical rope with mass as well as a weight tied to the bottom. It's also tied to the ceiling. This makes the tensions at both ends different. I don't know what I'm supposed to do. It doesn't appear I can use the beginning equation. If anybody could please help, I'd be very appreciative. Thank you.

David
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trouble is that in easy situations, we get used to thinking of tension as the force on the ends of a rope. But that view assumes the tension is the same all the way along the rope (which, as you note, isn't the case here). So the tension will vary as we head up the rope in question.

While we can't calculate the tension for the whole rope, we can calculate it for each tiny piece of the rope. Take a tiny length the rope (with negligible mass), and since the force on top and bottom is the same (given that there is, again, negligible mass), we can figure out tension in the usual way. And you can do that for any individual spot on the rope.

I hope that helps get you on the right track.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top