What are the Eigenvalues and Eigenkets of a Spin-1/2 System in a Magnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the eigenvalues and eigenkets of a spin-1/2 system in a magnetic field, specifically addressing the Hamiltonian H = H0 + V. The user successfully derived H0 and its eigenkets, confirming that they align with the eigenkets of σz. However, there is uncertainty regarding the expression for the potential V and how to proceed with finding the eigenvalues of H. Suggestions include using the matrix form of Pauli matrices to solve the eigenvalue problem and exploring alternative methods involving linear combinations of the eigenstates. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the matrix representation of operators in quantum mechanics.
phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a spin system with noninteracting spin 1/2 particles. The magnetic moment of the system is written as:
μ = (ħq/2mc)σ
Where σ = (σx, σy, σz) is the Pauli spin operator of the particle. A magnetic field of strength Bz is applied along the z direction and a second field Bx is applied along the x direction. The Hamiltonian of the particles is:
H = H0 + V
H0 = -μzBz
V = -μxBx
a) Find the eigenvalues and eigenkets of H0
b) Express V in terms of σ+ and σ-
c) Find the eigenvalues and eigenkets of H

Homework Equations


σ+ = σx + iσy
σ- = σx - iσy
σ+ = |+><-|
σ- = |-><+|
σz|+> = 1|+>
σz|-> = -1|->

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a) I'm pretty sure I did it right
H0 = (-qBzħ/2mc)σz or H0 = ε0σz if ε0 = -qBzħ/2mc.
The operators H0 and σz commute so they have the same eigenkets |+> and |->
Using the expression for H0 and the eigenvalue equations for σz given above the eigenkets of H0 are ε0 and -ε0.
Part b I'm not so sure. I wrote the expression for V in the same way that I did for H0:
V = (-qBxħ/2mc)σx
Then using equations given above I worked out that σx = (σ+ + σ-)/2, so I subbed that into the the expression to get:
V = (-qBxħ/4mc)(σ+ + σ-)
When I try to do part c I start running into problems and I think it is because I did something in part a or b wrong. Can anyone tell me if I've made any mistakes in part a or b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phys-student said:
V = (-qBxħ/4mc)(σ+ + σ-)
That looks right.
phys-student said:
I start running into problems
What are your problems?
 
When I try to find the eigenvalues of H I get the expression:

(-ε0σz - (qBxħ/4mc)(σ+ + σ-))|+> = ε|+>

and I don't know how to evaluate it properly. I tried plugging these in: σ+ = |+><-|, σ- = |-><+| but I have no idea what to do after that. Are you supposed to expand it so that you're taking the eigenvalue of the first term and the eigenvalues of the second term?
 
Write the matrix form of ##H## using the knowledge of the matrix form of Pauli matrices. Then solve the eigenvalue problem in resulting matrix equation.
 
I'm not very familiar with the matrix form of Pauli matrices, it wasn't covered in this course... Do you know of a source I can read that would help?
 
There is an alternative route to the solution. You know that the |+> and |-> kets for a complete basis, therefore the eigenstates of H can be written as a|+> + b|->. Try solving H (a|+> + b|->) = E (a|+> + b|->) for a and b (along with proper normalization).
 
Pauli matrices are related to the spin matrices of spin 1/2 particles. But if you are not yet familiar with those matrices, DrClaude's suggestion above will also do the job.
 
Back
Top