mtworkowski@o
- 213
- 0
I was thinking about the difference between the appearance of a propeller on a plane and a rotor on a helicopter. What is the consensus?
The discussion highlights the fundamental differences between propellers and rotors in aircraft design, emphasizing their distinct functions and structural characteristics. Propellers, such as those found on fixed-wing aircraft, primarily move air horizontally and feature significant twist to optimize thrust. In contrast, helicopter rotors, like those on the Chinook, exhibit a negative 12° twist towards the tips to manage lift variations along their length. The conversation underscores that while both components share a similar appearance, their design and operational principles are tailored to their specific roles in aviation.
PREREQUISITESAerospace engineers, aviation enthusiasts, and students studying aircraft design will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mechanics of propulsion and rotorcraft dynamics.
mtworkowski@o said:I'm also not seeing the twist that I see on a prop. I know that collective/cyclic controll needs that compromise but is that the reason the twist is not there?
There is a slight twist in helicopter blades, but not a huge twist like in a prop. For example, my beloved Chinook has a negative 12° twist towards the tips. The twist is there to accommodate the large length of the rotor and the resulting change in lift as you go from the hub to the tip. A prop is less like a real wing than a rotor blade. A prop, while can be feathered and adjusted, is less adjustable than a rotor blade which is why there is a huge twist in them, to get the max thrust they can get in their design condition. That is why a helicopter is a rotary-wing aircraft and not a prop driven aircraft.mtworkowski@o said:I'm also not seeing the twist that I see on a prop. I know that collective/cyclic controll needs that compromise but is that the reason the twist is not there?