What Are the Methods to Determine Surface Normal Direction at a Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physiker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Surface
physiker99
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
How do I find "surface normal direction" for a plane on a point with coordinates specified?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a plane equation or do you only have the coordinates of a point? Please be more specific.
 
i need to find normal directions for r^2=9 and x+y+z^2=1 at the point (2,-2,1)
 
physiker99 said:
i need to find normal directions for r^2=9 and x+y+z^2=1 at the point (2,-2,1)

First, neither of those surfaces are planes. The first is a spherical shell, and the second is a paraboloid.

Second, straight from wikipedia:

[PLAIN]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_normal said:
If[/PLAIN] a surface S is given implicitly as the set of points (x,y,z) satisfying F(x,y,z)=0, then, a normal at a point (x,y,z) on the surface is given by the gradient:

\mathbf{N}=\mathbf{\nabla}F

since the gradient at any point is perpendicular to the level set, and F(x,y,z) = 0 (the surface) is a level set of F.

I'd be shocked if this wasn't in your notes or textbook, and I strongly suggest you review the section of your text that covers this.

Anyways, just like wikipedia implies, to find a surface normal at a point, define F, take the gradient (in the appropriate coordinate system) and plug in the point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top