What Are the Methods to Determine Surface Normal Direction at a Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physiker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Surface
AI Thread Summary
To determine the surface normal direction at a point, it is essential to recognize that the given surfaces, r^2=9 and x+y+z^2=1, are not planes; the first is a spherical shell and the second a paraboloid. The normal at a point on a surface defined implicitly by F(x,y,z)=0 can be found using the gradient, represented as N=∇F, which is perpendicular to the surface. To find the normal direction at the specified point (2,-2,1), one must define the function F for the surface, compute its gradient, and evaluate it at the point. This method is fundamental and typically covered in relevant textbooks or notes. Understanding this process is crucial for accurately calculating surface normals.
physiker99
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
How do I find "surface normal direction" for a plane on a point with coordinates specified?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a plane equation or do you only have the coordinates of a point? Please be more specific.
 
i need to find normal directions for r^2=9 and x+y+z^2=1 at the point (2,-2,1)
 
physiker99 said:
i need to find normal directions for r^2=9 and x+y+z^2=1 at the point (2,-2,1)

First, neither of those surfaces are planes. The first is a spherical shell, and the second is a paraboloid.

Second, straight from wikipedia:

[PLAIN]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_normal said:
If[/PLAIN] a surface S is given implicitly as the set of points (x,y,z) satisfying F(x,y,z)=0, then, a normal at a point (x,y,z) on the surface is given by the gradient:

\mathbf{N}=\mathbf{\nabla}F

since the gradient at any point is perpendicular to the level set, and F(x,y,z) = 0 (the surface) is a level set of F.

I'd be shocked if this wasn't in your notes or textbook, and I strongly suggest you review the section of your text that covers this.

Anyways, just like wikipedia implies, to find a surface normal at a point, define F, take the gradient (in the appropriate coordinate system) and plug in the point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top