What are the Names of the Points on a Space Elevator's Path?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eagle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the naming of specific points along a space elevator's path, particularly the points where the counterweight reaches its highest and lowest positions relative to the plane of ecliptic. The points at 0 and 180 degrees are identified as orbital nodes, specifically the ascending and descending nodes. However, the names for the points at 90 and 270 degrees are less clear, with suggestions of "maximum elevation" and "maximum depression" being mentioned but lacking formal references. Participants express uncertainty about the terminology for these points and discuss the appropriateness of using these terms in academic writing. The conversation highlights the need for clarity and accuracy in naming conventions related to space elevator mechanics.
Eagle9
Messages
238
Reaction score
10
Good day!
On the image depicted below you see the Earth and Space Elevator, both they are tilted to plane of ecliptic at 23 degrees. The plane of ecliptic is shown as dark-green circle, Earth’s equator-grey ring and big red ring is the imaginary path drawn by the Space Elevator’s counterweight (there is inscription “Space Elevator”) at the certain altitude.

You can also see four yellow balls placed at that red ring. They are placed at some certain point of the ring, more precisely balls 0 and 180 are placed at this ring and at the plane of ecliptic at the same time, in other words they are placed exactly at the points where the red ring crosses plane of ecliptic (this can happen only at two places). Ball 90 is placed at the point where the red ring occupies the highest position in space (relative to the plane of ecliptic), ball 270-the lowest position.

I would like to know this: when I write that the Earth (with the Space Elevator) rotates around its axis the counterweight reaches these four point during 24 hours, so what do we call these points/balls? What can I write in my paper when I want to state that the counterweight reached on of these points? As far as I know balls 0 and 180 are called orbital nodes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_node), what about the points 90 and 270? :)
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/6884/15237974.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The 0 and 180 points are in fact called the orbital nodes - 0 would be the ascending node and 180 the descending node. If the other two have formal names, I have not been able to find them. I have sometimes heard them referred to as the point of maximum elevation and the point of maximum depression.
 
phyzguy said:
The 0 and 180 points are in fact called the orbital nodes - 0 would be the ascending node and 180 the descending node. If the other two have formal names, I have not been able to find them. I have sometimes heard them referred to as the point of maximum elevation and the point of maximum depression.

Maximum elevation
Maximum depression
It’s interesting :wink: I tried to find some information about these terms (regarding astronomy) in Wikipedia, Google but I could not, could you please tell me where did you hear/see about them?
 
No, I don't have a reference. That was just from memory and may not be accurate. But I'm sure about the other two (ascending and descending nodes).
 
phyzguy said:
No, I don't have a reference. That was just from memory and may not be accurate. But I'm sure about the other two (ascending and descending nodes).

Me too, but I would like to be sure regarding points 90 and 270 :wink:
 
What do other people in this forum say about this? Do you think that it would be OK if in my paper I write something like this: “When the Space Elevator’s counterweight reaches Maximum elevation/depression……………..” :smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top