What are the potential dangers and advancements in wireless power transmission?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential dangers and advancements in wireless power transmission, particularly focusing on the use of microwave frequency electromagnetic waves and space-based solar power generation. Participants explore both the historical context and contemporary research, as well as the practical implications and challenges of these technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Tesla's early experiments with wireless power transmission and express skepticism about the safety of using high-power microwave frequencies, suggesting potential dangers akin to "death rays."
  • Concerns are raised about the economic viability of space-based solar power generation, with one participant arguing that land area for solar projects on Earth is not a limiting factor.
  • Questions are posed regarding the efficiency of energy conversion for power down-link from space-based systems and the need for large receiving arrays and exclusion zones.
  • Another participant mentions a shift from microwave transmission to optical approaches in wireless power transmission, citing findings from the JPL Technical Reports Server.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and safety of wireless power transmission technologies, with no consensus reached on the viability of space-based solar power versus terrestrial solar projects.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the efficiency and safety of different wireless power transmission methods, as well as the economic implications of space-based versus land-based solar energy solutions.

MedievalMan
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Nothing new, ofcourse, in principle. Tesla experimented with it many years ago ;)

It has worked somewhat efficiently on a small scale (see http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/wireless-power.htm)

The beginning of this article mentions how it is dangerous, but the end says we may need to someday beam lots of power from solar panel satellites and/or a moon base to get some more power to meet growing demands.

My thoughts are:
Using microwave frequency EM waves, at very high power levels (even if MIT research gets them to be very directive, instead of spreading out equally in all directions) seems kind of dangerous to me.

Any thoughts from fellow engineers, physics gurus or hobbyists? :)

Had to mention the Tesla Roadster:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/tesla-roadster2.htm
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
MedievalMan said:
Using microwave frequency EM waves, at very high power levels (even if MIT research gets them to be very directive, instead of spreading out equally in all directions) seems kind of dangerous to me.
That greatly understates it. Yes, such schemes are too similar to hypothetical death rays. It sounds like the Diamonds are Forever James Bond film.

Besides danger, the economics of space-based PV panels are very unattractive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and sophiecentaur
All these space-based ideas for Power Generation ignore the fact that we are really not short of land area for solar projects. The day / night effect on surface arrays could be said to be relevant, compared with near 24 hour coverage for a satellite but that seems, to me, to be the only thing in favour of the space borne approach. Just how overall efficient would the energy conversion be for the Power Down-link? Massive areas would be needed for receiving arrays plus large exclusion zones would be needed around the sites.
True- the reliability of orbiting equipment is extremely good and there are always possible effects of weather and life forms on land based equipment. But it's much more convenient to maintain and it can be sited to suit the community. HV DC transmission wire links are very good value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
14K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K