What Are the Practical Implications of Infinitely Many Cardinal Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motivation
epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
Where's the motivation for concluding that there are infinitely many unique infinite cardinal numbers?

I understand the proof for it and accept it, but what other useful implications of this can be drawn in mathematics? It almost seems like Cantor developed this idea in set theory just to say he developed something. It reminds me of the topic of fuzzy logic, sure its a well written idea, and even sort of cool, but where's the usefulness and potential?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure abut its functional significance, though my experience with set theory is minimal (at least, a set theorist would think so). But note that the result is motivated largely by the existence of cardinal numbers; once you define them and show they exist, "how many are there?" is a natural question to ask.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top