MHB What Are the Solutions to the System of Inequalities for Target Heart Rate?

mathland
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
One formula for a person’s maximum heart rate is 220 − x, where x is the person’s age in years for
20 ≤ x ≤ 70. The American Heart Association recommends that when a person exercises, the person should strive for a heart rate that is at least 50% of the maximum and at most 85% of the maximum.

(a) Write a system of inequalities that describes the exercise target heart rate region.

I need someone to get me started here.

(b) Find two solutions of the system and interpret their meanings in the context of the problem.

What exactly is part (b) asking for? Is part (b) asking for the value(s) of x?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's a start:
(a) What is 50 percent of 220 - x? What is 85 percent of 220 - x?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Here's a start:
(a) What is 50 percent of 220 - x? What is 85 percent of 220 - x?

-Dan

(A)0.50(220 - x) = 110 - 0.50x

(B)

0.85(220 - x) = 187 - 0.85x
 
mathland said:
(A)0.50(220 - x) = 110 - 0.50x

(B)

0.85(220 - x) = 187 - 0.85x
Good! So what's the range of values this could take? (Hint: What's the smallest value of x?)

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top