A What Are the Stationarity and Limitations of the Standard Accretion Disk Model?

AI Thread Summary
The standard accretion disk model assumes stationarity to simplify calculations, but this is not entirely accurate as real disks can exhibit variability. Limitations of the model include the assumption of a thin disk, which fails in regions where gravitational forces and temperature gradients are significant. The thin disk approximation is invalid throughout the entire disk due to variations in density and temperature, leading to non-uniform behavior. Additionally, real accretion disks do not radiate perfectly, complicating the model further. Overall, while the standard model provides a useful framework, it has inherent limitations that must be acknowledged.
AstroLove
hi I'm an astronomy student and i was studying the standard accretion disk model and I've got some questions related to it.!

why do we consider the accretion disk to be stationary in standard accretion disk model?
and what are the limitations of standard disk model?

and i just read somewhere that '' The thin disk approximation is not valid in the whole disk'' can anyone tell me why is it so?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
AstroLove said:
and i just read somewhere that '' The thin disk approximation is not valid in the whole disk'' can anyone tell me why is it so?

Most approximations are not completely valid. If Earth was a sphere there would be no mountains, no waves on the sea.

Also some things do not radiate perfectly.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top