- #1
Albert1
- 1,221
- 0
$a,b,c \in N$
(1) $1<a<b<c$
(2)$(ab-1)(bc-1)(ca-1) \,\, mod \,\, (abc)=0$
$find :a,b,c$
(1) $1<a<b<c$
(2)$(ab-1)(bc-1)(ca-1) \,\, mod \,\, (abc)=0$
$find :a,b,c$
max value is not 1 \(\displaystyle its \frac{13}{12}\)...has a maxmum value of 1...
yes (2,3,5) is the only solution..,but how to get the answer ?mathworker said:But,I guess (2,3,5) is the only solution...(Smirk)
very nice solution(Yes)mathworker said:In,
\(\displaystyle \frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}=1+\frac{1}{abc}\)
L.H.S to be greater than one (a,b) should be (2,3) substituting them rest is linear equation
\(\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{c}=1+\frac{1}{6c}\)
\(\displaystyle c=5\)
To find the values of a, b, and c in an equation, you can use the quadratic formula, which is (-b ± √(b²-4ac))/2a. Plug in the values of a, b, and c from the equation into this formula to solve for the unknowns.
No, you need all three values of a, b, and c to solve for each unknown. If only 2 out of 3 values are given, there are infinitely many solutions for the unknowns.
In a quadratic equation in the form of ax²+bx+c=0, a, b, and c represent the coefficients of the equation. The value of a determines the shape of the parabola, b affects the position of the parabola, and c is the constant term. These values are important in solving and understanding quadratic equations.
No, there is no specific order in which to find a, b, and c. However, it is important to follow the correct steps in solving a quadratic equation, such as simplifying and combining like terms, before using the quadratic formula to find the values of a, b, and c.
Yes, there are other methods for solving quadratic equations, such as factoring, completing the square, and graphing. However, the quadratic formula is the most efficient and accurate method for finding the values of a, b, and c in any quadratic equation.