MHB What are the values of x for f(x) = g(x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iwanttolearn1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the values of x for which f(x) = g(x), the equations f(x) = x^2 and g(x) = 10 - 3x are set equal to each other, resulting in the equation x^2 + 3x - 10 = 0. This quadratic equation can be solved using the quadratic formula or by inspection. The discussion emphasizes the importance of substituting the functions correctly to form a solvable equation. The participant expresses gratitude after understanding the solution process. The thread highlights a common challenge in solving equations by substitution and the collaborative nature of seeking help in math forums.
Iwanttolearn1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, mathhelpboards. I'm having trouble solving this problem on my review but can't figure out how to start it.

Find the values of x for which f(x) = g(x).

f(x) = x^2 , g(x) = 10 - 3x.

It seems like its easy but I can't really pick out what to put what where.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Iwanttolearn said:
Hello, mathhelpboards. I'm having trouble solving this problem on my review but can't figure out how to start it.

Find the values of x for which f(x) = g(x).

f(x) = x^2 , g(x) = 10 - 3x.

It seems like its easy but I can't really pick out what to put what where.

Hey Iwanttolearn! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Let's see...
\[
f(x)=g(x) \Rightarrow x^2=10-3x \Rightarrow x^2+3x-10=0
\]
For which $x$ would that be the case? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey Iwanttolearn! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Let's see...
\[
f(x)=g(x) \Rightarrow x^2=10-3x \Rightarrow x^2+3x-10=0
\]
For which $x$ would that be the case? (Wondering)

So you would put the f(x) value into the g(x)? I think that looks right or either I'm completely wrong.
 
Iwanttolearn said:
So you would put the f(x) value into the g(x)? I think that looks right or either I'm completely wrong.

We're replacing the occurences of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ by their respective definitions.
That gives us an equation we can solve with the quadratic formula, or just with inspection...
 
I like Serena said:
We're replacing the occurences of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ by their respective definitions.
That gives us an equation we can solve with the quadratic formula, or just with inspection...

Oh wow! I get it now. Many thanks your way!(Handshake)(Happy)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top