What Are Voronov's Key Contributions to Operads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kea
  • Start date Start date
Kea
Messages
859
Reaction score
0
Er. Thanks, Greg. Do you think maybe we could have just one link to all
these nice notes? Voronov's homepage is

http://www.math.umn.edu/~voronov/

Cheers
Kea :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lecture 6

In lecture 6, Voronov defines an operad as a collection of sets indexed by n. What this really means is that it is a monoid, ie. based on a single object, in a category of functors from some category P into Set. The category P is just a disjoint collection of symmetric groups as one object categories.

Now there is a nicer category than P which is also related to the ordinals. That is, the category S whose objects are labelled by n, sets of n elements, and whose morphisms are the maps between these sets. The really wonderful thing is that a (set valued) operad based on this category is something called a Lawvere theory! These show up everywhere. One is given a sequence of sets S_{n} of n-ary operations. In conjunction with a set of Axioms one has a Lawvere theory. For example, the theory of a commutative ring with unit has two elements in S_{0}, namely 0 and 1, one operation in S_{1}, namely the negation, and the binary operations of addition and multiplication.

Theories can have models, ie. interpretations in any category (well, we need products). For example, the models of the theory of groups in Set turns out to be the same thing as the category of groups. Anyway, it turns out that Lawvere theories have universal models given, for instance, by the Yoneda embedding!

This is nicely explained in an old article of Kelly's, On the Operads of J.P. May http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/13/

Sorry if I got a bit carried away ... Greg started it.
:smile:
 
Kea, originally I had these in our tutorial section, but we thought they'd be better served in here. Enjoy!
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top