- #456
Frabjous
Gold Member
- 1,600
- 1,927
I accept that toilette training is a STEM topic, but spiderman underwear sounds like a personal theory.berkeman said:Two words -- "Spiderman underwear". Worked for berkeboy.
I accept that toilette training is a STEM topic, but spiderman underwear sounds like a personal theory.berkeman said:Two words -- "Spiderman underwear". Worked for berkeboy.
I would propose to extend STEM into STEMP, where P stands for psychology. One of the reasons is that we are in the phase when challenges to beat the pandemic or global warming have more to do with psychology than with medicine or environmental science.caz said:I accept that toilette training is a STEM topic
From the way you put it, I'm note sure whether you support measures and vaccine or are against them. But to put it on topic, a psychology book everyone should read isvanhees71 said:Looking at a growing group of anti-corona measures and -vaccination propagandists in Germany, I'd suggest that P stands even for psychiatry, but that's indeed off-topic.
Given that this is a physics forum, this sounds like you are against the sun.vanhees71 said:also pro anti-corona measures
But only superficially.caz said:this sounds like you are against the sun.
I think it is growing not only in Germany. I am not sure what is my favorite argument given from them, if it is "to take vaccine will make you to turn gay" or "the implantation of devil chip in our bodies". I think the last one is a little old, not so funny anymore, so my favorite now is to take vaccine make you gayvanhees71 said:Looking at a growing group of anti-corona measures and -vaccination propagandists in Germany, I'd suggest that P stands even for psychiatry, but that's indeed off-topic.
Covariant Physics: From Classical Mechanics to General Relativity and Beyond
Well, they are from this year. By Amazon TOC they do not seem bad. But again, we need to let some months pass, to get unbiased/unpaid opinions. Anyways, in case they turn good, thanks for suggestions.andresB said:Somebody has read these two? they look interesting.
Modern classical mechanics
Covariant Physics: From Classical Mechanics to General Relativity and Beyond
The topic of stochastic forces, I guess it's covered in Langevin equation.dextercioby said:Well, they are from this year. By Amazon TOC they do not seem bad. But again, we need to let some months pass, to get unbiased/unpaid opinions. Anyways, in case they turn good, thanks for suggestions.
How do you like Ross Differential Equations? It is actually one of my favorite books. If you like Ross, and want to learn PDE, then there is a similar book. I forget the author but the cover is blue, and the professor worked at a university located in Honolulu? He was the guy that set fire to his office lol.Mr.Husky said:I am revising classical mechanics from kleppner and kolenkow. Studying ODE's from Ross differential equations. Going through hubbard and hubbard in my free time. Studying organic chemistry (just started) from LG WADE. Trying to give some time for OXTOBY introduction to modern chemistry.
That paper looks good to me ##-## for further exploration, I suggest:Borg said:Trying to get a better handle on Graph Neural Networks. This seems to be a pretty good article for working up from the basics so far - https://distill.pub/2021/gnn-intro/#other-types-of-graphs-multigraphs-hypergraphs-hypernodes
The TOC is hereDemystifier said:B. Zwiebach, Mastering Quantum Mechanics (2022)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/026204613X/?tag=pfamazon01-20
New excellent QM textbook, very pedagogic, suitable for beginners, yet very complete (about 1100 pages long) and containing many modern topics which other textbooks rarely discuss.
Provided that you already know everything else.dextercioby said:Only 3 chapters worth a read: 18, 22, 23.
See post #484 by @dextercioby.haushofer said:Can you give some examples of such topics?
Really? :-(((2.4 Photoelectric Effect
In this and in the following section, we will discuss some foundational experiments relating to
photons. e first is the photoelectric effect. The second is Compton scattering. Together, these two
experiments convinced physicists that photons are quanta of light.
vanhees71 said:Quote from the book:Really? :-(((
Historically that may be right, but neither the PE nor Compton scattering prove the necessity for quantization of the em. field. This is really well-known now. Why do textbook writers, particularly of QM intro textbooks, always just copy the mistakes from the tradition?
Besides, where are the postulates clearly stated?