What average power does the boy need to produce?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average power needed for a boy to produce while moving vertically. Initial calculations included forces and angles, but participants pointed out that the angle and distance were not provided in the problem. The correct approach involves using energy principles, specifically gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, leading to a total energy change of 960 Joules. This results in an average power output of 160 Watts over a time period of 6 seconds. The conversation emphasizes that work done does not depend on the path taken, only the change in height matters for calculating gravitational potential energy.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
see attached Number 3 (highlighted in red)
Relevant Equations
Power and energy
1732330831730.png


In my approach, i have

##F_{Resolved} = 300 \cos 60^{\circ} = 150## Newtons.

I also have,

... from ##v=u +at##
##2=0 +6a##
##a= \dfrac{1}{3}##.

##F=ma##
##F=30 ×\dfrac{1}{3} = 10## Newtons

Therefore,

##P= \dfrac{(150+10) ×6}{6} = 160 ## W

Insight is welcome. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
##F_{Resolved} = 300 \cos 60^{\circ} = 150## Newtons.
What force are you calculating, and where does that angle come from?
chwala said:
I also have,

... from ##v=u +at##
##2=0 +6a##
##a= \dfrac{1}{3}##.
We are not told whether the boy starts at rest.
chwala said:
##P= \dfrac{(150+10) ×6}{6} = 160 ## N
The Newton is a unit of force, not power.
 
Typo will amend that...
 
chwala said:
Typo will amend that...
Ok, but my first point in post #2 is the important one.
 
I used this approach,

1732355316847.png
 
chwala said:
I used this approach,

View attachment 353813
I ask again, where do you get that angle from?
It is not given in the question, and neither is the distance of 6m.
And you have not answered my question about the force. What forces act on the boy? What is the net force? How does that relate to the acceleration?

I'll give you a hint: forces are not the way to solve the question. What else can you try?
 
I used ##s=ut + \dfrac{1}{2}at^2## to determine the hypotenuse distance... with the vertical height given i was able to determine the angle as indicated. Looks like this was wrong? The forces are weight acting downwards, there is also the normal contact force which acts perpendicularly to direction of motion, therefore no work done and thus will not be considered...and the force acting along the slope which i was able to use ##F=ma## to analyse that.


Ok i see i need to use energy principles... let me check on this again.
 
Last edited:
Now clear we have,

Total energy change = gravitational potential energy + kinetic energy.

##= (30×10×3) + \left[ \dfrac{1}{2} ×30× 4 \right]= 900+60 = 960## Joules.

Therefore, Power = ## \dfrac{960}{6} = 160 ## Watts.

Thanks...learnt something today.
 
chwala said:
I used ##s=ut + \dfrac{1}{2}at^2## to determine the hypotenuse distance... with the vertical height given i was able to determine the angle as indicated.
You are not given s or a, so I do not see how you could have found either.
chwala said:
Now clear we have,

Total energy change = gravitational potential energy + kinetic energy.

##= (30×10×3) + \left[ \dfrac{1}{2} ×30× 4 \right]= 900+60 = 960## Joules.

Therefore, Power = ## \dfrac{960}{6} = 160 ## Watts.

Thanks...learnt something today.
Yes, except that, as I noted in post #2, you are not told that this is from a standing start. Maybe he was already doing 2ms-1 when he reached the bottom of the stairs.

Also you should include units as soon as you introduce numbers:
## (30kg×10ms^{-2}×3m) + \left[ \dfrac{1}{2} ×30kg× 4m^{2}
s^{-2} \right]= 900J+60 J= 960J##.
 
  • #10
... so the ascent is vertical and not an incline- i did not seem to get that right.
 
  • #11
chwala said:
... so the ascent is vertical and not an incline- i did not seem to get that right.
No, stairs are not vertical. The climb is at an angle but why do you think that matters?

If a man carries 100 lbs over a total vertical distance of 10 feet, is the work done different depending on whether he does this across 10 feet horizontally or 100 feet horizontally?
 
  • #12
chwala said:
... so the ascent is vertical and not an incline- i did not seem to get that right.
What we know for sure is that the muscular effort of that child has increased the potential energy of 3 kg corresponding to a delta altitude of 3 meters in 6 seconds.

Work does not depend on time, but power does.
If the muscles had needed 60 seconds to perform the same work, we would have said that an average power 10 times lower had been produced instead.
 
  • #13
chwala said:
... so the ascent is vertical and not an incline- i did not seem to get that right.
Just to add to what's already been said (since it’s important), note that the change in gravitational potential energy (##\Delta##GPE) is ##mg\Delta h## where ##\Delta h## is the change in height.*

For example, ##\Delta##GPE for a mass moving 2 metres vertically upwards is the same as for the mass moving along a ramp where the top is 2 metres higher than the bottom.

The route taken doesn't matter - when finding ##\Delta##GPE it's only the height-difference between the start and end points that matters.
___________________
*Assuming the height-change isn’t so big that changes in ##g## need to be taken into account.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and chwala
Back
Top