Programs What can I expect as a physics major in terms of workload and problem solving?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BetaDecay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expectations for combining physics with calculus, particularly for students transitioning from conceptual physics and basic calculus. The consensus is that physics courses, especially those based on calculus, primarily involve problem-solving, particularly word problems, rather than traditional practice exercises like in math. Initial physics classes, such as classical mechanics, may not heavily utilize calculus, but later topics like electricity and magnetism will require more advanced mathematical techniques, including integration and vector calculus.Participants emphasize that while the homework often consists of solving problems, understanding the underlying concepts is crucial for success. Many share that challenges, particularly with mathematical modeling, are common and that proficiency improves significantly with practice. Experiences suggest that physics problems can be easier to grasp conceptually compared to complex mathematical modeling, indicating that students can succeed in physics if they can apply concepts effectively. Overall, persistence and practice are highlighted as key to overcoming initial difficulties in physics coursework.
BetaDecay
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have had conceptual physics courses with very little math involved and I have had math through my first term of calculus. So far I really like them both. However, I am unsure about what to expect when physics is combined with calculus. Is it mostly problem solving or are there practice exercises too, like in math? I don't mind a lot of work, but I would like to know what the work is like so that I can be sure that I will enjoy it. I have it in my mind that most of the homework is sitting and figuring out problems, but I don't know if that's all or just part of it. Please advise on what I can expect the work to be like as a physics major. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to answer this because I have no idea what school you are at, nor what your curriculum is like. So take what follows with a grain of salt.
However, I am unsure about what to expect when physics is combined with calculus. Is it mostly problem solving or are there practice exercises too, like in math?

It's mainly problem solving. In the calc based physics offered at my school, the only thing we ever did was solve word problems (some straight forward... Some fat and juicy). But this varies from teacher to teacher.

In your first physics class, classical mechanics, you really won't use much calculus. When you get to electricity and magnetism, however, you will do a lot of integrating and will even get exposed to a little bit of vector calculus.

I have it in my mind that most of the homework is sitting and figuring out problems, but I don't know if that's all or just part of it

You have to study the material well to be good at solving the problems, but yes, it's mainly solving word problems.
 
Thank you

Thank you. Your reply answered my question. I am also in the Northwest (Oregon). It is my plan to do a double major in physics and philosophy. Now I am concerned about the physics part.
Even though I finished with an a+ grade overall, my last calculus class had mathematical modeling problems that were really difficult. My teacher said not to worry and that it is hard for everyone at first and that it just takes practice, but after those hard problems I began to wonder if I am cut out for physics. :cry: The straight forward problems are not bad of course.
If anyone has their experience to share on this, it would be helpful. For example: if it did get easier with practice for them or if it didn't.
 
For example: if it did get easier with practice for them or if it didn't.

Everything gets easier with practice. :wink:
 
BetaDecay said:
my last calculus class had mathematical modeling problems that were really difficult. My teacher said not to worry and that it is hard for everyone at first and that it just takes practice, but after those hard problems I began to wonder if I am cut out for physics. :cry:

In my experience the word problems in physics tend to be easier to conceptualize than equivalent word problems in mathematics (basing this on Halliday-Resnick-Walker 7th Ed). In that physics textbook, every single problem is effectively a word problem, but there is minimal mathematical modeling that needs to be done (most of the questions are presented clearly and straightforward).

Mathematical modeling does takes some practice to get used to, but you should do fine in a physics class as long as you can apply the concepts to the problems.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
396
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top