What Causes Lightning Rods to Buzz?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatentLawyer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lightning
AI Thread Summary
The buzzing sound from lightning rods during thunderstorms is primarily caused by corona discharge, which involves intermittent electrical discharges between the rod and the atmosphere. This phenomenon generates a series of rapid, tiny discharges that create a continuous buzzing noise, akin to the sound of a gatling gun. The mechanical vibrations of the lightning rod can resonate at various frequencies, amplifying the sound. Additionally, the ionization and heating of the surrounding air contribute to this auditory effect. Understanding these mechanisms clarifies the relationship between lightning rods and the buzzing sound they produce.
PatentLawyer
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am familiar with the basic theory of how lightning rods work, at least as explained in the text "Electromagnetics" by Kraus (Ohio State).

I was once standing on the roof of a 14-story dormitory at the U. of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. A thunderstorm was approaching.

The lightning rods on the roof all began to buzz.

I was taking a course in electromagnetic fields at the time. I related the buzzing to the prof, but he had no explanation.

Can anybody explain this ? I suppose the ambient 60 Hz field from the power company could be implicated somehow.

Thank you.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The buzz you hear is due to corona discharge. Google it.
 
I am sorry, but "corona discharge" does not answer the question of why buzzing (mechanical vibration) should occur.

When I said I was familiar with the basics as outlined in Kraus, why do you assume that I am unaware of "corona discharge" ?

Does anybody REALLY know the answer ?
 
There is intermittent discharge between the rod and the atmosphere.
The buzzing is the sound caused by ionization and heating of the atmosphere.
 
clem said:
There is intermittent discharge between the rod and the atmosphere.
The buzzing is the sound caused by ionization and heating of the atmosphere.

I agree, although a few more words might add clarity. The intermittent discharges are so closely spaced in time that it is more like a waterfall than a single water drop. The myriad, tiny "thunderclaps" are so closely spaced as to produce the buzzing sound. An analogy would be the noise made by a modern gatling gun. Rather than hear the individual muzzle blasts one hears a loud buzz when the gun is fired. By the way, I was up on a ladder, staining log siding close to a lightning rod, when the sky darkened. I too heard the buzz and scooted down the ladder with the hairs on my neck standing erect (probably more due to primal fear than any associated electromagnetic effect).
 
PatentLawyer said:
I am sorry, but "corona discharge" does not answer the question of why buzzing (mechanical vibration) should occur.

When I said I was familiar with the basics as outlined in Kraus, why do you assume that I am unaware of "corona discharge" ?

Does anybody REALLY know the answer ?

As much as I never assumed you weren't unaware of corona discharge phenomena, I do assume you're quite aware what uppercase means in forums like this.
Having said that, I'd suggest further reading about corona discharges and you'll find they can be fairly powerful sound sources because of its pulsed behavior. Therefore, the ligthning rod can start vibrating at any of its resonance frequencies. That's the sound you hear.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top