What causes the radioactive decay of an unstable nucleus?

AI Thread Summary
Radioactive decay of unstable nuclei is often attributed to quantum fluctuations, which are random events governed by the principles of quantum mechanics. While some argue that this decay represents a "spontaneous power," it is clarified that energy conservation laws apply, meaning no true spontaneous power is generated. The weak force, particularly in processes like beta decay, plays a crucial role in these decays, with alpha decay involving tunneling phenomena. The randomness of decay events means individual atoms cannot be predicted, but statistical measures like half-lives can be accurately determined. The discussion highlights the philosophical implications of defining "uncaused" versus "random" events in the context of nuclear physics.
sayetsu
Messages
46
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A philosopher uses the example of a radium atom's decay as an example of an "uncaused" power, but my prof says such events are actually caused by "quantum fluctuations."
Relevant Equations
n/a
A philosopher whose work I'm using in a paper uses a radium atom's decay as an example of a "spontaneous power," or an uncaused event. My professor, though, says "quantum fluctuations" cause radioactive decay. What are these fluctuations, and do we know what causes them? It's a college paper, so I could use some citable resources which I could understand as a student of philosophy, not physics, please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nuclear decay is an example of the weak force or weak interaction:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

Note that quantum mechanical interactions obey energy conservation, so there is no spontaneous power generated, where power is energy per unit time. The total energy of the system is conserved.
 
PeroK said:
Nuclear decay is an example of the weak force or weak interaction.
If it's some sort of beta decay. Radium initially decays by emitting an alpha particle, which is due to tunneling.

https://www.nist.gov/image-23773
 
The decay is random, though, in the sense that we cannot predict when a given atom will decay. All we can do (AFAIK) is determine an accurate half-life for a large collection of the unstable atoms.

Conflating "uncaused" with "random" seems to be an error, but I hesitate to say that for sure, without knowing what the philosopher's definition is for "uncaused."
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, PhDeezNutz and FactChecker
So we have two philosophers (your professor and this other person) going back and forth about a physics topic?

I hope OP settles this quandary and gets a good grade on his/her paper but I don’t see this thread lasting long.
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk, vanhees71 and Bystander
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top