What creates the angular acceleration in a pulley?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factors contributing to angular acceleration in a pulley system, particularly in the context of a fixed pulley with a rope and varying masses attached. Participants explore the implications of tension differences and the assumptions made in analyzing such systems, including scenarios like the Atwood machine.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a free body diagram of a fixed pulley, noting that equal tensions lead to cancellation of torque, raising the question of what causes angular acceleration when masses differ.
  • Another participant asserts that when the rope accelerates, the tensions are not equal, suggesting that there is greater tension in the direction of acceleration.
  • A participant questions the validity of analyzing forces in an Atwood machine under the assumption of equal tensions, citing specific equations for two different masses.
  • It is proposed that the tension difference is negligible if the pulley is massless and frictionless, but a more accurate approach would involve recognizing that the tension on either side is slightly different due to the force at the pulley edge, which applies torque.
  • One participant mentions that treating the pulley as an additional mass could simplify calculations, referencing the Moment of Inertia as a necessary concept for this approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equality of tensions in the pulley system, with some arguing that tensions can be treated as equal under certain approximations, while others emphasize the importance of accounting for tension differences. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differences on angular acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the mass and friction of the pulley, which affect the accuracy of the tension analysis. The discussion also highlights the complexity of deriving precise solutions versus using approximations.

conorwood
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Looking at the free body diagram of a fixed pulley with a rope going over the top half, the diagram would show tension going downward on either side and an anchor going up equaling twice the tension. I understand this is this case so the pulley doesn't move in any rectilinear motion. However, since the tensions are equal, the torque cause by the forces of tension are equal and opposite and they cancel out. I am having trouble understanding what causes angular acceleration in this case, for example when two masses of different size are attached to the ends of the rope.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the rope is accelerating, the tensions are NOT equal. There is more tension in the direction the rope is accelerating. Not a lot, of course, as pulleys are deliberately light, usually.
 
If that is the case, then why can we analysis the forces in something like an Atwood machine as if the tension on either side were equal?

for example, in the case where we know m1 and m2 (mass one and mass two), m1<m2, and T = force of tension

for m1:

ƩF = m1a

T - m1g = m1a

and for m2:

ƩF = m2a

m2g - T = m2a

we can solve for T in one equation and substitue this in for the other to find acceleration.

If the two T's are different like how sophiecentaur describes, then how are we able to make this substitution?
 
conorwood said:
we can solve for T in one equation and substitue this in for the other to find acceleration.

If the two T's are different like how sophiecentaur describes, then how are we able to make this substitution?

That substitution is completely correct only if the pulley is massless and frictionless. However, it is a very good approximation if the mass of the pulley and the frictional effects are small compared with the masses of the two weights.

You could, if you wanted, reject this approximation and do a more exact solution. The tension on the two sides is not the same, it's slightly different, and this difference is caused by a small force between the rope and the edge of the pulley. It is this force that applies torque to the pulley to change its rotation. Solve the problem this way and you'll end up doing a huge amount of additional math, and all you'll have to show for it is a few extra decimal places in the predicted acceleration of the masses.
 
thank you!
 
Nugatory said:
Solve the problem this way and you'll end up doing a huge amount of additional math, and all you'll have to show for it is a few extra decimal places in the predicted acceleration of the masses.
Actually, it's not a massive problem (no pun intended) if you treat the pulley as being equivalent to just another mass that needs to be accelerated (say by adding half the eqivalent to each side). To find that equivalent mass, you 'just' need to be familiar with Moment of Inertia.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K