What determines a system to experience crossover or phase transition?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factors that determine whether a system experiences a crossover or a phase transition when a parameter in the Hamiltonian is varied. Participants explore this question in the context of theoretical models, particularly the Dicke model, and consider implications for thermodynamic limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that changing a parameter in the Hamiltonian can lead to different behaviors, specifically crossovers or phase transitions, and seeks general guidance on this distinction.
  • Another participant suggests that the rate of change of the parameter (da/dt) influences whether a crossover or phase transition occurs, with fast changes leading to crossovers and slow changes potentially resulting in phase transitions.
  • A participant defines phase transitions as characterized by non-analytic changes, contrasting them with crossovers, which do not exhibit such behavior. They highlight complications such as finite size effects and the difficulty of tuning systems precisely to phase transitions.
  • One participant agrees with the idea that energy level crossing corresponds to phase transitions, while avoided crossings correspond to crossovers. They mention that mixing of states can lead to gaps and discuss factors that can forbid this mixing, such as symmetry differences and topological indices.
  • Another participant affirms that level crossings are associated with phase transitions and references a formalism involving quantum fidelity to support this perspective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of crossovers versus phase transitions. While some agree on the relationship between energy level crossings and phase transitions, there is no consensus on the broader implications or specific conditions that govern these phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations related to finite size effects and the challenges of observing singular behaviors in real systems, although some focus on theoretical frameworks under the thermodynamic limit.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers and students in theoretical physics, particularly those studying phase transitions, quantum mechanics, and related models in condensed matter physics.

arielleon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
More specifically, consider a Hamiltonian with a changeable parameter a. When changing a, the ground state of the system will change. In some cases, one phase crossovers to another, like in other cases, there's a phase transition. What factor determines the difference? Actually I am now working on a specific model, the Dicke model. And I want to consider the above question in this and related model. So before that, I want some general guidances about the question to get to the point quicker. Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about where there is an avoided energy level crossing, due to off-diagonal terms in the Hamiltonian?

455041a-f1.2.jpg

The theory is covered in the first 4 pages of a paper by Rubbmark et al.:
Phys. Rev. A 23, 3107–3117 (1981): "Dynamical effects at avoided level crossings: A study of the Landau-Zener effect using Rydberg atoms"

At the risk of oversimplifying things, it is determined by the rate at which a is changed. For a fast da/dt, the system will cross over; for a slow da/dt, it does not cross over.
 
Last edited:
arielleon said:
More specifically, consider a Hamiltonian with a changeable parameter a. When changing a, the ground state of the system will change. In some cases, one phase crossovers to another, like in other cases, there's a phase transition. What factor determines the difference? Actually I am now working on a specific model, the Dicke model. And I want to consider the above question in this and related model. So before that, I want some general guidances about the question to get to the point quicker. Thx.

A phase transition is characterised by non-analytic (smooth or continuous) changes. Crossovers will not have this non-analytic behaviour.

That, at least, is the definition. However, in practice, several things complicate matters.

1. Finite size. Truly singular behaviour can only occur in thermodynamic systems, with infinite volume/particle number, etc. Real systems, especially those used in experiments with cold atoms or (for you?) exciton/polariton systems, are finite and sometimes very finite (N is O(100)). This will prevent singularities from being directly observed, but sometimes some work based on finite-size scaling can recover the theoretical limit.

2. Suppose that the discontinuity is in a high order (high derivative). This will again usually end up being obscured by experimental noise, etc.

3. It's usually *very* hard to tune a system to be actually on the phase transition itself, which will tend again to round off singularities.

In real life these things tend to be the basis for some very fervent discussions (see BCS/BEC literature, or cuprates, for examples of where decades of arguments were essentially on whether the observed phenomenon were really phase transitions).

If you don't mind me asking, where are you working/studying?
 
What I am talking is about theories under thermodynamic limit, so no finite size problem or experimental difficulties. I got some new thoughts today, welcome commence.
I agree with Redbelly98 that it's about energy level crossing or avoiding. Crossing corresponds to a transition, avoiding to a crossover. The avoiding, in many cases, comes from the second-order perturbation, which mixes the original two “near-energy” state and opens a gap. When the mixing is forbidden, a transition happens. There're several ways to forbid it. The most common factor is that the original two states are of different symmetries. This kind of transition is continuous one. Another factor may be topological index, which I have only heard about and know little. Thanks a lot.
 
You are completely correct that level crossings tend to cause phase transitions. There is a very nice formalism which deals with this point of view, using the concept of quantum fidelity (basically, overlap between ground states with different parameters). Review paper: http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v99/i9/e095701
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
900
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K