What Determines If One Variable Can Be Fourier-Transformed Into Another?

Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
Frequency can be fourier-transformed into time and vice versa. They're inversely related.

In QM, momentum can be fourier-transformed into position and vice versa. But they're not necessarily inversely related. The uncertainty in time and the uncertainty in position merely have a lower bound.

So how do you determine how one variable can be fourier-transformed into another variable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Simfish said:
Frequency can be fourier-transformed into time and vice versa. They're inversely related.

Not exactly. Fourier analysis works on groups of information items (such as position at a particular time for many different points of time) So it can translate a group of positions at different times into a group of frequencies and vice versa.
 


Given any continuous function of a variable x, we can apply a Fourier transform that will decompose the function into a sum of sin(nx) and cos(nx) (in this case, n can take on any real value at all, and we can give the sines and cosines any complex weighting)

The n in this case is a "frequency" with respect to x.

In quantum systems, we can take the position wave function (which gives us the probability amplitude at each position) and Fourier transform it with respect to position. The "frequency" of the sines and cosines with respect to position is called the "wave length", and according to deBroglie, this is hbar * momentum.

So when we do a Fourier transform, we get some quantity like a frequency or wavelength. That this is related to any other physical quantity like momentum is put in by physics.

On the other hand, we can formally define a momentum via the Fourier transform of the wave function of some "position type measurement", and this generalized momentum can have many of the same properties of the usual momentum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top