What determines the acceleration of an object in an infinite time frame?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeromodz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
In an inertial frame of reference with no external forces, an object like a pen will initially accelerate when a force is applied. According to Newton's second law (F = MA), the pen can achieve a certain acceleration, such as 1 m/s². However, once the force is removed, the pen will stop accelerating and continue moving at a constant velocity due to inertia. It will not reach 99% of the speed of light because continuous acceleration requires an ongoing force. Ultimately, the acceleration ceases when the applied force is no longer present.
zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
Okay if I was in an inertial frame of reference where there are no forces involved. If I were throw a pen by exerting a force on it, I would give it an acceleration of let's say 1 m/s^2

F = MA
A = F / M

So say that pen drifted of into space forever, wouldn't it eventually accelerate to 99% the speed of light since it has an infinite amount of time to accelerate? If there are no other forces on the pen. Wouldn't the acceleration eventually stop, even if there are no other forces? and what determines when it will stop accelerating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
Okay if I was in an inertial frame of reference where there are no forces involved. If I were throw a pen by exerting a force on it, I would give it an acceleration of let's say 1 m/s^2

F = MA
A = F / M

So say that pen drifted of into space forever, wouldn't it eventually accelerate to 99% the speed of light since it has an infinite amount of time to accelerate? If there are no other forces on the pen. Wouldn't the acceleration eventually stop, even if there are no other forces? and what determines when it will stop accelerating?

Once you let go of the pen it stops accelerating because there is no more applied force. it just goes on moving at a constant velocity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top