What Determines the Peak Angular Speed of a Rotating Cylinder?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the peak angular speed of a cylindrical roller used in manufacturing, with a diameter of 1.00 m. The angular position is given by the equation θ = 2.50t² - 0.600t³, leading to the derived angular speed formula ω = 5t - 1.8t². The maximum angular speed is found to be 3.47 rad/s at t = 1.389 seconds, while the driving force should be removed at t = 2.78 seconds to prevent reversal of rotation. The tangential speed at the rim is calculated as 1.74 m/s, and the roller completes approximately 1.02 rotations before the driving force is removed. The calculations align with the expected solutions, confirming the understanding of the problem.
menglish20
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a manufacturing process, a large, cylindrical roller is used to flatten material fed beneath it. The diameter of the roller is 1.00 m, and, while being driven into rotation around a fixed axis, its angular position is expressed as

θ =2.50t2 - 0.600t3

where θ is in radians and t is in seconds. (a) Find the maximum angular speed of the roller. (b) What is the maximum tangential speed of a point on the rim of the roller? (c) At what time t should the driving force be removed from the roller so that the roller does not reverse its direction of rotation? (d) Through how many rotations has the roller turned between t=0 and the time found in part (c)?

Homework Equations



I think this has to do with translational and angular quantities. ac=v2/r=rω² might be useful.

For part b, at=rα

The Attempt at a Solution



I took the derivative of the rotational position to get angular speed in terms of t. I know the radius is .5 m. I don't understand how a max speed can be reached, as it would increase indefinitely with time. I don't think I'm grasping the problem. I also don't understand how the roller could reverse its direction. Any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, menglish20! :smile:

In the manufacturing process, the roller would be first accelerated to a max speed and then decelerated to a stop.

You said you calculated the derivative. So what did you get?
You did solve it for being equal to zero?
Note that you're only interested in solutions where t > 0 and the where t is smaller than the time where the angular velocity becomes zero again.
 
Glad to be here :smile:

Right so the derivative would be
ω=5t - 1.8t2
So I solve for that set to zero, and i get t = 0, 2.78.

So I know the time where the velocity peaks is between those times. I'm going to guess that it acts parabolic, so the peak must be the midpoint, so t=1.389 s.
With that, I find vmax=3.47 rad/s

For part c, the driving force should be removed at 2.78s correct? If not I guess I still don't understand what's going on in terms of the manufacturing process.
 
menglish20 said:
Glad to be here :smile:

Right so the derivative would be
ω=5t - 1.8t2
So I solve for that set to zero, and i get t = 0, 2.78.

Good! :smile:

menglish20 said:
So I know the time where the velocity peaks is between those times. I'm going to guess that it acts parabolic, so the peak must be the midpoint, so t=1.389 s.
With that, I find vmax=3.47 rad/s

Actually, you calculated the max angular velocity here.
This is not the tangential velocity.

Edit: Do you know the relation between these two?
Btw, you may have found by now, that the relevant equations you mentioned are not needed in this problem.

menglish20 said:
For part c, the driving force should be removed at 2.78s correct? If not I guess I still don't understand what's going on in terms of the manufacturing process.

Yes! :wink:
At this time the angular velocity is zero, so if the angular acceleration is set to zero, it will remain zero, which is intended.
 
Do you know the relation between these two?
Btw, you may have found by now, that the relevant equations you mentioned are not needed in this problem.

v=rw

So, I'd take .5 * 3.47 = 1.74 m/s.

Then for part d,

θ = 6.43, so the number of rotations would be 1.02.

All these answers match the given solutions, thanks for clarifying this problem!
 
You're welcome! :smile:

And thanks for taking the time to finish this thread and say thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top