Moonbear said:
Except men are really simple, they just want sex, right?
Yes. But preferably with someone we have a special da-de-da blah blah blah.
Moonbear said:
Oh, and exclusive access to the TV remote.
That confirms an American stereotype. I don't watch television and none of my male friends do. In the UK, it's the women who seem to be addicted to the soap-infested television. They're definitely in charge... until a match is on that is.
pattylou said:
"Offended" is too strong.
That was one for the more lunar of our large mammals.
pattylou said:
Someone was seeking advice on what American women want. Did you want feedback from women, or not?
It's not my thread. I don't really care. But yeah, I think that was my point. Having a go at the blokes for the lack of female input is... weird.
pattylou said:
p.s. when I was in my early 20s I didn't care about girls v women one way or the other. So it's entirely possible that the females in your life don't care.
Is that addressed to me? FemaleS?!? Plural?!? You are either very wise or very presumptious. Either way, you may continue to spread that particular rumour all you like.
pattylou said:
Okay. Men want women with a sense of humor. Note: this means someone who will laugh at their jokes, not someone who tells jokes.
I don't know. Sense of humour, definitely. But I don't really do jokes. Me and mine have a pretty witty rapport that can get hysterical. That's the kind of sense of humour I'm after - improvisational! A performing arts degree really helpful.
pattylou said:
Men want their egos stroked, but not obviously. Something like "Oh honey, you shouldn't have to do that, you've been working hard today so sit back and let me get that" does wonders. Or "A man like you shouldn't have to..." sprinkled into the conversation a few times a month.
To an extent, though certainly not to the fishing-for-compliment levels that some women go to. Do we come across as requiring that much attention? I think I'm the opposite. I get kinda snappy when someone is buzzing around me. I like some 'me' time. A lot of it.
pattylou said:
No woman has offered this criterion yet have they. Decades of women's fashion and gossip magazines just can't change the fact that there's only one gender that sees the true potential in recreational shagging.
pattylou said:
Good looks and good hygiene. Preferably natural good looks.
You've hurt Zooby, now you're dissing his zoo*****es.
pattylou said:
Someone who can follow an intelligent conversation or look sexy while taking a motor apart or programming in a new computer language is a plus too.
Well... yes. Basically a cross between Sarah Beany and Carol Vordermann is what we're after.
pattylou said:
Damn right, so stop with all there "we're women, not girls" bull, alright?!?
pattylou said:
Or eating too much, smoking too much, drinking too much, sleeping too much, watching too much TV... in fact, nothing that ends in 'too much', otherwise it wouldn't be too much, would it!
pattylou said:
Snoring probably isn't an issue. We're not known to be light sleepers.
pattylou said:
No one that tries to drag them to chick flicks.
Chick flicks not so bad, just no Richard Curtis movies... ever... PLEASE!
pattylou said:
Kudos on changing 'girls' to something broader, hombre'. You're clearly intelligent and responsive to the wishes of those around you.
Yeah, that's me: kind, considerate, responsive, ironic...
pattylou said:
p.s. in case you're wondering, yes that last bit was an intentional ego stroke for you.
I've seen a doctor. He told me no matter how much I or anyone else strokes it, it ain't getting any bigger. Fill yer boots, but you're wasting your time.
