I What do applied mathematicians deal with?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter mech-eng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied
AI Thread Summary
Applied mathematicians focus on using mathematical techniques to solve real-world problems in fields like physics, biology, chemistry, and economics, distinguishing themselves from pure mathematicians who prioritize theoretical concepts. The discussion highlights that while physicists also apply mathematics, the distinction lies in the approach and mindset, with applied mathematicians aiming to refine and clarify mathematical models. It is noted that many areas of pure mathematics, such as topology and geometry, have applications in physics, suggesting a blurred line between pure and applied mathematics. The conversation reflects a perception of rivalry between pure and applied mathematicians, emphasizing their differing priorities and methodologies. Overall, applied mathematics is seen as integral to various scientific disciplines, bridging theoretical concepts with practical applications.
mech-eng
Messages
825
Reaction score
13
TL;DR Summary
I am looking for the basic differences of applied mathematicians from pure mathematicians and physicists.
Hello. I have this question in my mind many years. I need to clarify my confused mind. I wonder how applied mathematicians differ from pure mathematicians and physicists. Many years ago I read that applied mathematicians and pure mathematicians do not like each other. Is this true? To me, as the name suggests, applied mathematics is application of mathematics, and this mostly happens in physics, biology (maybe computational biology?), chemistry and economics.

1. Physics also deals a lot with mathematics. Physicists already apply mathematics. There are even fields as "mathematical physics" and the books written on that fields full of application of mathematics to physical phenomena.

2. I have checked the fields of pure mathematics. One of them was topology and geometry. But aren't topology and geometry also find application in physics, so they are applicable fields, not pure.

Would you please explain the facts?

Regards,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pure mathematics is like classical music; applied mathematics is more like jazz; and physics is like rock and roll.
 
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes mcastillo356 and jedishrfu
A physicist would throw some equations together on the blackboard and say see that seems to work.

The applied mathematician would look at the mess and say we need to clean that up a bit.

The pure mathematician would say what's with all those numbers and ugh you use that brand of chalk, I only use Hagoromo chalk to write my sublime proofs found in The Book.



Dyson's life story may give an idea of the differences too:

https://plus.maths.org/content/freeman-dyson-dies-96
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude, topsquark, mech-eng and 1 other person
And here's Feynman's take on mathematicians:

 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude, topsquark and mech-eng
mech-eng said:
1. Physics also deals a lot with mathematics. Physicists already apply mathematics. There are even fields as "mathematical physics" and the books written on that fields full of application of mathematics to physical phenomena.
My mentor used to say: 'There are two types of physicists: mathematicians and blacksmiths.'

This probably describes the mindsets more than the actual fields.
mech-eng said:
2. I have checked the fields of pure mathematics. One of them was topology and geometry. But aren't topology and geometry also find application in physics, so they are applicable fields, not pure.
You can find applications for almost all parts of mathematics. If you look at the real world and take applied literally, then you are left with statistics and stochastics, maybe also numerical analysis (but this is widely substituted by shear computer power) as applied mathematics, and the rest is pure mathematics, regardless of any flimsy applications notwithstanding.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top