I What do the Roman Numerals mean in Spectroscopic Data?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter arthurhaythornthwait
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Mean
arthurhaythornthwait
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
What exactly does each roman numeral mean?
A basic question. Looking at the NIST spectroscopic data, what exactly is, for example, Ar I vs Ar II vs Ar III? If Ar I is unionised Argon, then is Ar II an Ar- ion or an Ar+ ion? (and whichever way around it works, how do we denote the opposite ionisation? If they are all ionized, is there such a thing as Ar 0 (plain argon)? I'm not aware that the romans understood zero or negative numbers...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arthurhaythornthwait said:
TL;DR Summary: What exactly does each roman numeral mean?
Welcome to PF. A quick Google search on Roman numerals in spectroscopy gives this as the first hit:

http://legacy.ifa.hawaii.edu/newsletters/article.cfm?a=517
Spectral lines are designated according to the level of ionization by adding a Roman numeral to the symbol of the chemical element. Neutral atoms are denoted by I, singly ionized atoms (those missing one electron) with II, and so on. For example, Fe IX represents an iron atom that is missing eight electrons.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
Who was it that said "you can tell the difference between a chemist and an economist by how they pronounce 'unionised'"?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Twigg, DrJohn, arthurhaythornthwait and 1 other person
Thanks for this. It answers the question, but as always raises the other - what about negatively ionised species (Cl-, etc.) ?
 
mjc123 said:
Who was it that said "you can tell the difference between a chemist and an economist by how they pronounce 'unionised'"?
A chef might say you're spelling it wrong.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top