What do u need to learn topology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter michealsmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
michealsmith
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
wat do u need to learn topology?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
time.... :-))
 
Familiarity with analysis, and some algebra would help too...
 
what do you need to learn anything?

in this case you need to be not scared when I say the following:

If X is a set, then a topology on X is a collection of subsets T in P(X) (the power set) satisfying the following axioms:

X is in T, the empty set is in T, the union of arbitrarily many elements of T is an element of T, and the finite intersection of elements of T is an element of T.

That is exactly what a topology of open sets on X is. Examples: the trivial topology: T is the empty set and X alone

The cofinite topology, T contains the empty set, X and precisely those subsets of X whose complements are finite.

If X is a metric space then the open sets in the metric are a topology.

If any or all of that is too daunting then learn some more set theory and analysis
 
Last edited:
michealsmith said:
wat do u need to learn topology?

Basic set theory and algebra -- that's about it. Depending on how the course is taught, other stuff will definitely be handy, but not actually essential. That said, a lot of topology will make more sense if you have exposure to concepts from analysis.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
549
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
493
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top