- #1

- 825

- 54

Please vote and if possible state the reasons for holding your belief. As a review here are the two major views with quotes by leading physicists in quantum foundations:

**1. Observed violations of Bell's inequalities implies that nature is non-local:**In 1964, Bell proved that any serious version of quantum theory (regardless of whether or not it is based on microscopic realism) must violate locality. He showed that if nature is governed by the predictions of quantum theory, the "locality principle," precluding any sort of instantaneous (or superluminal) action-at-a-distance, is simply wrong, and our world is nonlocal.

What is most relevant to Bell's Theorem is that the non-locality which it makes explicit in Quantum Mechanics is a small indication of pervasive ultramicroscopic nonlocality. If this conjecture is taken seriously, then the baffling tension between Quantum nonlocality and Relativistic locality is a clue to physics in the small.

**2. Observed violations of Bell's inequalities implies anti-realism (e.g. quantum measurement results do not pre-exist)**...quantum measurement results do not preexist in any logically determined way before the act of measurement.

...unperformed tests have no outcomes: it is wrong to try to account for the outcomes of all the tests you might have performed but didn’t.

Last edited: