student34
- 639
- 21
Homework Statement
2n
Ʃ (k)
k=1
The Attempt at a Solution
2n
Ʃ (k) = 2n(2n+1)/2 (This is just a shot in the dark.)
k=1
The discussion revolves around the summation expression with an upper limit of 2n, specifically examining how it differs from a summation with an upper limit of n. Participants are exploring the implications of changing the upper limit in the context of summing integers.
Some participants have provided guidance on the relationship between the summation formulas and have confirmed that substitution can be applied to derive results for different upper limits. Multiple interpretations of the summation's behavior are being explored, but there is no explicit consensus on the broader implications.
Participants are working under the assumption that the standard formula for the sum of the first N integers applies, and they are testing its validity for different values of N. There is a sense of uncertainty regarding the implications of these substitutions.
student34 said:Homework Statement
2n
Ʃ (k)
k=1
The Attempt at a Solution
2n
Ʃ (k) = 2n(2n+1)/2 (This is just a shot in the dark.)
k=1
Dick said:Sure. If you've shown the sum from 1 to n of k is n*(n+1)/2, then the sum to 2n is just 2n*(2n+1)/2. It's just substitution.
student34 said:So would this work too?
2n+1
Ʃ (k) = (2n+1)((2n+1)+1)/2
k=1
student34 said:Homework Statement
2n
Ʃ (k)
k=1
The Attempt at a Solution
2n
Ʃ (k) = 2n(2n+1)/2 (This is just a shot in the dark.)
k=1