What does mobile phone accelerometers actually measure

AI Thread Summary
Mobile phone accelerometers measure the total acceleration acting on the device, which includes all forces applied to it. When the phone is in free-fall, the accelerometer reads zero, indicating that it is in a non-inertial reference frame. The discussion clarifies that the accelerometer does not distinguish between different types of acceleration; it simply reports the net acceleration experienced by the phone. For those seeking specific readings related to inertial frames, the conversation suggests looking for specialized apps. Understanding these principles ties into broader concepts in physics, such as general relativity.
Shashwat Sher
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys

I am using a mobile phone to collect some accelerometer data for my walking experiments. I know this topic is done to death but a specific answer that I have never got is what does mobile phone accelerometers actually measure? Do they give the acceleration due to all the forces acting on the mobile or do they provide only the physical acceleration with respect to the inertial frame? If it is the former, do you know any apps that provide the latter readings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really understand your question. How is "the acceleration due to all the forces acting on the mobile" different from "the physical acceleration with respect to the inertial frame" ? The accelerometer measures the total acceleration acting on the phone. If the phone is being accelerated then the phone's reference frame is non-inertial. In other words, if the phone is in free-fall, the accelerometer measures zero. If the phone is being accelerated by the sum of forces acting on it, then the accelerometer measures the net acceleration. Does this answer your question.
 
Last edited:
Indeed (thanks @phyzguy) if you get this then you get a key gist of (Einstein's) general relativity. So congratulations to the O.P. and anyone else tuned in?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top