What does mobile phone accelerometers actually measure

AI Thread Summary
Mobile phone accelerometers measure the total acceleration acting on the device, which includes all forces applied to it. When the phone is in free-fall, the accelerometer reads zero, indicating that it is in a non-inertial reference frame. The discussion clarifies that the accelerometer does not distinguish between different types of acceleration; it simply reports the net acceleration experienced by the phone. For those seeking specific readings related to inertial frames, the conversation suggests looking for specialized apps. Understanding these principles ties into broader concepts in physics, such as general relativity.
Shashwat Sher
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys

I am using a mobile phone to collect some accelerometer data for my walking experiments. I know this topic is done to death but a specific answer that I have never got is what does mobile phone accelerometers actually measure? Do they give the acceleration due to all the forces acting on the mobile or do they provide only the physical acceleration with respect to the inertial frame? If it is the former, do you know any apps that provide the latter readings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really understand your question. How is "the acceleration due to all the forces acting on the mobile" different from "the physical acceleration with respect to the inertial frame" ? The accelerometer measures the total acceleration acting on the phone. If the phone is being accelerated then the phone's reference frame is non-inertial. In other words, if the phone is in free-fall, the accelerometer measures zero. If the phone is being accelerated by the sum of forces acting on it, then the accelerometer measures the net acceleration. Does this answer your question.
 
Last edited:
Indeed (thanks @phyzguy) if you get this then you get a key gist of (Einstein's) general relativity. So congratulations to the O.P. and anyone else tuned in?
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top