MHB What Does the Encircled Equation Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the encircled equation that equates the $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$ components of forces. Participants clarify that the resultant force $\mathbf F_R$ is zero, meaning both horizontal and vertical force components must also equal zero. This leads to the conclusion that the forces acting on the system are balanced, resulting in no net force. One user questions why the components become zero, suggesting they cancel each other out. The explanation confirms that the problem states the resultant force is zero, necessitating the individual components to also be zero.
Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
Hello! :)

I just want to ask how, did the encircled portion come about?

It says that it equates the $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$ components.

but when I tried that, this is what I get

$0.5447F_{1}=F_{3}(\sin(\theta)-\cos(\theta))$ ---> This expression doesn't ring a bell. It doesn't make any sense to me.
 

Attachments

  • mechanicsCHII-46.jpg
    mechanicsCHII-46.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 68
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Drain Brain said:
Hello! :)

I just want to ask how, did the encircled portion come about?

It says that it equates the $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j}$ components.

but when I tried that, this is what I get

$0.5447F_{1}=F_{3}(\sin(\theta)-\cos(\theta))$ ---> This expression doesn't ring a bell. It doesn't make any sense to me.

Hi Drain Brain,

The $\mathbf F_R$ on the left hand side is really:
$$\mathbf F_R = 0\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\imath} + 0 \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$$
Since the $\boldsymbol{\hat\imath}$ component is completely independent from the $\boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$, we match them left and right.

Put otherwise, we separate the equation in:
- Sum of the horizontal forces is zero
- Sum of the vertical forces is zero
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Drain Brain,

The $\mathbf F_R$ on the left hand side is really:
$$\mathbf F_R = 0\cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\imath} + 0 \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$$
Since the $\boldsymbol{\hat\imath}$ component is completely independent from the $\boldsymbol{\hat\jmath}$, we match them left and right.

Put otherwise, we separate the equation in:
- Sum of the horizontal forces is zero
- Sum of the vertical forces is zero

Hi, I Like Serena!

Can you tell me why the i and j components become 0?

What I'm thinking about the problem is that the components of $F_{R}$ are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction that's why they cancel each other and produce a resultant of 0. Is my line of thinking correct? If not please explain to me why the components became both 0. Thanks!
 
Drain Brain said:
Hi, I Like Serena!

Can you tell me why the i and j components become 0?

What I'm thinking about the problem is that the components of $F_{R}$ are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction that's why they cancel each other and produce a resultant of 0. Is my line of thinking correct? If not please explain to me why the components became both 0. Thanks!

It's because the problem statement says:

The three concurrent forces acting on the screw eye produce a resultant force of $\mathbf F_R = \mathbf 0$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top