What does the g-factor, from say ESR, tell you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick_starstrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Esr
Click For Summary
The g-factor derived from Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) provides insights into the electronic environment of paramagnetic species. It indicates the degree of spin-orbit coupling and can reveal information about the symmetry and bonding characteristics of the system. Variations from the expected value of 2.0003 suggest interactions with nearby ions or changes in the local magnetic field. While the magnetic field for resonance isn't a definitive identifier of compounds, the Δg value serves as a more reliable fingerprint for molecular characterization. Understanding the g-factor is crucial for interpreting the behavior of materials in condensed matter physics.
maverick_starstrider
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
7
From ESR data you can extract the g-factor and "effective" magnetic field. Let's say I get this g-factor from ESR, what does it tell me? i.e. "if the g-factor is X then Y is happening in the system". What specific information can I get from knowing this factor? What causes it to differ from 2.0003.. whatever?
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
atyy said:
I googled and found http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Spectroscopy/Magnetic_Resonance_Spectroscopies/Electron_Paramagnetic_Resonance/EPR:_Interpretation.

"The magnetic field for resonance is not a unique “fingerprint” for the identification of a compound because spectra can be acquired at different microwave frequencies. Then what is the fingerprint of a molecule? It is Δg."

Right but this is the trivial case. Like when biologists use it to identify free radicals in solution. I'm talking about thing like in Condensed Matter, where you already know what the substance is but people do ESR to tell you... something. I understand that the splitting of peaks can help you identify hyperfine splitting and thus the relative influence of nearby ionics cores on the free electron but what does the g-factor tell you?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
First, I need to check that I have the 3 notations correct for an inner product in finite vector spaces over a complex field; v* means: given the isomorphism V to V* then: (a) physicists and others: (u,v)=v*u ; linear in the second argument (b) some mathematicians: (u,v)=u*v; linear in the first argument. (c) bra-ket: <v|u>= (u,v) from (a), so v*u . <v|u> is linear in the second argument. If these are correct, then it would seem that <v|u> being linear in the second...