What does the graph of (-2)^x look like?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
reaver
Can some one tell me what the graph of (-2)^x is i tryed but i only got errors.

Thank in advance for your help

reaver
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
what do you mean by "what is the graph"?

just take some values of x, work out y with a calculator and draw it on some graph paper!

or write a few program lines..
 
I wonder if Jonnylane tried doing that himself! If you try to graph y= (-2)x by plotting values, you can calculate values for integer values of x but that won't necessarily tell you the true graph. In this case it certainly doesn't!

If you try to use a calculator to calculate values for fractional x, you are going to get more error messages.

In general, the function ax is only defined for positive a. (-2)x is going to be undefined for almost all x!
 
Can the function be graphed in the complex plane, or is it truly undefined for nonintegral x values?
 
You can obtain values of (-2)^x for any x, but your calculator needs a little help because you obtain complex values:

(-2)^x
= (2ei[pi])x
= 2x (ei[pi])x
= 2x (cos([pi]x) + i sin([pi]x))

Which is a spiral in the complex plane, which touches the real axis for all integer values of x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top