I What does the j means in this notation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the notation of the Maxwell's Stress Tensor in Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics." The symbol 'j' on the left-hand side represents the jth component of the vector resulting from the operation of a vector on the tensor. Each value of 'j' corresponds to a different equation, as the equations describe the relationship between the components of the vector and the tensor. The equations are not a single equation but rather a set of equations for each component, illustrating how they relate to each other. Clarification on this notation helps in grasping the underlying concepts of tensor operations in electrodynamics.
sams
Gold Member
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
This section of Introduction to Electrodynamics by Griffiths, section 8.2.2 (page 363), is talking about the Maxwell's Stress Tensor. I do not quite understand what the j means on the left = sign (for either of the two representations) in the attached figure highlighted in yellow color. I have read about tensors and their Index Gymnastics but I still do not understand this notation. Any help is much appreciated.

Many thanks!
Tensor.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The LHS is the jth component of the vector ##\vec a \cdot \overleftrightarrow T##.
 
  • Like
Likes sams
How can j affect the summation on the right side of the equation? Does it decrease the tensor by one rank?
 
Last edited:
Each of the equations is really three different equations, one for every possible value of j.
 
  • Like
Likes sams
How come they are different equations? Isn't it one equation, since we have the summation operator leading to different terms but added together to form one equation?
 
You do not have a summation over j. The j represents different components of a vector. If you take two vectors ##\vec v## and ##\vec w## that are equal, this is the same as saying that their components are equal. This would be written ##v_j = w_j##, which represents one equation for every possible value of ##j##. The equations you posted are really no different from this. They are telling you how the components of ##\vec a \cdot \overleftrightarrow T## and ##\overleftrightarrow T \cdot \vec a## relate to the components of ##\vec a## and ##\overleftrightarrow T##.
 
  • Like
Likes sams
To be more specific. Writing out the sum in the first equation would give you
$$
\sum_{i = x,y,z} a_i T_{ij} = a_x T_{xj} + a_y T_{yj} + a_z T_{zj}.
$$
Letting ##j = x## you would now get
$$
\left(\vec a \cdot \overleftrightarrow T\right)_x = a_x T_{xx} + a_y T_{yx} + a_z T_{zx}
$$
whereas if you let ##j = y## you get the different relation
$$
\left(\vec a \cdot \overleftrightarrow T\right)_y = a_x T_{xy} + a_y T_{yy} + a_z T_{zy}
$$
and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes sams
Thank you so much Orodruin for the valuable information...
 
Back
Top