What does the notation f|A mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pellman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Notation
AI Thread Summary
The notation f|A indicates a function f with its domain restricted to the set A. In the context provided, it signifies that the function F is being considered only on the intersection of U_{-\lambda} and U_0. This restriction allows for the analysis of F as a diffeomorphism within that specific subset. The inverse function is similarly restricted, demonstrating the relationship between the original function and its domain. Understanding this notation is crucial for clarity in mathematical discussions involving function restrictions.
pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Here is an instance of the notation in context.

If U_\lambda = F_\lambda(U_0) and U_\lambda\cap U_0\neq\emptyset, then F_\lambda |U_{-\lambda}\cap U_0 :U_{-\lambda}\cap U_0 \rightarrow U_0 \cap U_\lambda is a diffeomorphism and its inverse is F_{-\lambda}|U_0 \cap U_\lambda.

So what does the notation f|A in f|A:A\rightarrow B (where f is a function and A and B are sets) mean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's usually written f|A as a subscript; it means f with its domain restricted to only A. While you don't have the original definition up, obviously the original domain of F in your statement was U0 (or some superset thereof) and now they're looking at F restricted to the intersection with U-lambda
 
That fits the other instances of its usage in the text. Thank you.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top