I What does the product part of Laughlin wave function mean?

George Keeling
Gold Member
Messages
181
Reaction score
41
TL;DR Summary
confused by product symbol with two subscripts
I am looking at the Laughlin wave function and it contains the term
$$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q$$
In Wikipedia the lower index on ##\Pi## is ##1\le i<j\le N## and there is no upper index. I'm not sure what either mean. For example would
$$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q=\prod_{k=2}^{N}\left[\prod_{j=1}^{k-1}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q\right]?$$
(It seems that ##k## cannot be 1 because there would be nothing to multiply in the second product). I'm not sure what else the expression could mean.

For ##N=3## that would give ##\ \left(z_1-z_2\right)^q\left(z_1-z_3\right)^q\left(z_2-z_3\right)^q## I think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is the meaning of that product symbol with two subscripts.
 
  • Like
Likes George Keeling, Demystifier and pines-demon
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
First consider the case t <t' Alpha is the state of the system at time t' given that a hole was created at single particle state ##\nu## at earlier time t. And beta is the state of the systembat time t' given that a hole is created at state ##\nu## at that instant. It gives me good physical interpretation that lesser function for t<t' is proportional to probablity amplitude for the hole created at time t in state ##\nu## would remain in state nu at time t' also. Now consider t>t' Alpha is...
Back
Top