Insights What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Dirac's delta function, introduced in his 1930 work on quantum mechanics, serves as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. It is a mathematical construct that simplifies the representation of functions and distributions in physics. The Kronecker delta represents the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra, highlighting the relationship between discrete and continuous systems. This notation is essential for various applications in quantum mechanics and mathematical analysis. Understanding the delta function is crucial for grasping advanced concepts in physics and engineering.
Messages
19,787
Reaction score
10,739
TL;DR Summary
Dirac introduced the delta function in 1930 as a continuum analog to the Kronecker delta.
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.

In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra

Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/

by @jambaugh
 
  • Like
Likes chwala and bhobba
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
TL;DR Summary: Dirac introduced the delta function in 1930 as a continuum analog to the Kronecker delta.

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.

In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra

Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/

by @jambaugh
Viewed as a mathematical object it is simply a function where the value is 1 at 0 and 0 every where else. The idea that you can take the derivative or intergal of this monster is interesting. I would say it is a degenerate function like a line segment could be viewed as a degenerate ellipse where one of the axis is 0. As to how it is used in quantum mechanics I have no idea.
 
zerodish said:
Viewed as a mathematical object it is simply a function where the value is 1 at 0 and 0 every where else.
At what value of ##x## does the Dirac delta function ##\delta\left(x\right)## equal to ##1\,##?
 
zerodish said:
Viewed as a mathematical object it is simply a function

No it is not (it's functional) and I don't see why you try to make up your own definitions when this is a completly understood and formalized topic. I haven't read the insights but I guess it goes into details.
 
You’re right about the history, but one fix: the Dirac delta isn’t a pointwise function (the “1 at 0, 0 elsewhere” object integrates to 0). It’s a distribution (aka generalized function): a linear functional that picks out values of smooth test functions.

Here’s a compact, copy-paste-ready “delta kit” with a fresh, measure-aware angle you can drop into your Insight.

1) Definition (distribution + measure-aware form)​

Let D(R)\mathcal{D}(\mathbb{R})D(R) be smooth test functions with compact support.
The Dirac delta at x0x_0x0 is the linear functional

⟨δx0, φ⟩  =  φ(x0) (φ∈D).\boxed{\ \ \langle \delta_{x_0},\ \varphi \rangle \;=\; \varphi(x_0)\ \ }\qquad(\varphi\in\mathcal{D}). ⟨δx0, φ⟩=φ(x0) (φ∈D).
Measure-aware version (unifies Kronecker and Dirac):
Given a positive measure μ\muμ on a space XXX, define δx0(μ)\delta^{(\mu)}_{x_0}δx0(μ) by

∫Xφ(x) δx0(μ)(x) dμ(x)=φ(x0) .\boxed{\ \ \int_X \varphi(x)\,\delta^{(\mu)}_{x_0}(x)\,d\mu(x)=\varphi(x_0)\ \ }. ∫Xφ(x)δx0(μ)(x)dμ(x)=φ(x0) .
  • Counting measure on a finite set ⇒\Rightarrow⇒ δi(count)(j)=δij\delta^{(\text{count})}_{i}(j)=\delta_{ij}δi(count)(j)=δij (Kronecker).
  • Lebesgue measure on R\mathbb{R}R ⇒\Rightarrow⇒ standard Dirac delta.
  • Lattice →\to→ continuum bridge (spacing aaa):
δij  ≈  a δ(xi−xj) .\boxed{\ \ \delta_{ij} \;\approx\; a\,\delta(x_i-x_j)\ \ }. δij≈aδ(xi−xj) .

2) Canonical identities​

  • Sifting property
∫−∞∞δ(x−x0) φ(x) dx=φ(x0).\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta(x-x_0)\,\varphi(x)\,dx=\varphi(x_0).∫−∞∞δ(x−x0)φ(x)dx=φ(x0).
  • Scaling
δ(ax)=1∣a∣ δ(x),a≠0.\delta(a x)=\frac{1}{|a|}\,\delta(x),\qquad a\neq 0.δ(ax)=∣a∣1δ(x),a=0.
  • Change of variables (composition)
δ ⁣(f(x))=∑xk: f(xk)=0δ(x−xk)∣f′(xk)∣ (simple zeros).\boxed{\ \ \delta\!\big(f(x)\big)=\sum_{x_k:\ f(x_k)=0}\frac{\delta(x-x_k)}{|f'(x_k)|}\ \ } \quad\text{(simple zeros)}. δ(f(x))=xk: f(xk)=0∑∣f′(xk)∣δ(x−xk) (simple zeros).
  • Derivatives (distributional)
⟨δ(n),φ⟩=(−1)n φ(n)(0),∫δ′(x−x0) φ(x) dx=−φ′(x0).\langle \delta^{(n)},\varphi\rangle=(-1)^n\,\varphi^{(n)}(0),\quad \int \delta'(x-x_0)\,\varphi(x)\,dx=-\varphi'(x_0).⟨δ(n),φ⟩=(−1)nφ(n)(0),∫δ′(x−x0)φ(x)dx=−φ′(x0).
  • Convolution identity
δ∗φ=φ,δ is the identity of (D′,∗).\delta*\varphi=\varphi,\qquad \delta \text{ is the identity of }(\mathcal{D}',*).δ∗φ=φ,δ is the identity of (D′,∗).
  • Fourier transform (physicist’s convention)
F{δ}(k)=1,F{1}(k)=2π δ(k).\mathcal{F}\{\delta\}(k)=1,\qquad\mathcal{F}\{1\}(k)=2\pi\,\delta(k).F{δ}(k)=1,F{1}(k)=2πδ(k).

3) Approximate identities (mollifiers)​

Any nonnegative g∈L1(R)g\in L^1(\mathbb{R})g∈L1(R) with ∫g=1\int g=1∫g=1 yields a delta sequence:

gϵ(x)=1ϵ g ⁣(xϵ) ⟹ lim⁡ϵ→0+∫gϵ(x) φ(x) dx=φ(0).g_\epsilon(x)=\frac{1}{\epsilon}\,g\!\left(\frac{x}{\epsilon}\right)\ \ \Longrightarrow\ \\lim_{\epsilon\to 0^+}\int g_\epsilon(x)\,\varphi(x)\,dx=\varphi(0).gϵ(x)=ϵ1g(ϵx) ⟹ ϵ→0+lim∫gϵ(x)φ(x)dx=φ(0).
Canonical choices:

Gaussian:   12πϵ e−x2/(2ϵ2),Lorentzian:   1πϵx2+ϵ2,sinc kernel:   sin⁡(x/ϵ)πx.\text{Gaussian: } \; \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\epsilon}\,e^{-x^2/(2\epsilon^2)},\qquad\text{Lorentzian: } \; \frac{1}{\pi}\frac{\epsilon}{x^2+\epsilon^2},\qquad\text{sinc kernel: } \; \frac{\sin(x/\epsilon)}{\pi x}.Gaussian: 2πϵ1e−x2/(2ϵ2),Lorentzian: π1x2+ϵ2ϵ,sinc kernel: πxsin(x/ϵ).

4) Physics quick-use​

  • Position kets: ⟨x∣x′⟩=δ(x−x′)\langle x|x'\rangle=\delta(x-x')⟨x∣x′⟩=δ(x−x′), completeness ∫∣x⟩⟨x∣ dx=I\int |x\rangle\langle x|\,dx=\mathbb{I}∫∣x⟩⟨x∣dx=I.
  • Green’s functions: LG=δ\mathcal{L}G=\deltaLG=δ defines the Green operator L−1\mathcal{L}^{-1}L−1.
  • Impulse response: input δ(t)\delta(t)δ(t) produces the system’s impulse response h(t)h(t)h(t).
  • Spectral density (quantum):
ρ(E)=Tr⁡ δ(H−E)= ⁣−1π Im⁡Tr⁡ (H−E−i0)−1 .\boxed{\ \ \rho(E)=\operatorname{Tr}\,\delta(H-E)=\!-\frac{1}{\pi}\,\operatorname{Im}\operatorname{Tr}\,(H-E-i0)^{-1}\ \ }. ρ(E)=Trδ(H−E)=−π1ImTr(H−E−i0)−1 .

5) Geometry/topology nuggets​

  • Multidim delta: δ(x)=δ(x)δ(y)δ(z)\delta(\mathbf{x})=\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)δ(x)=δ(x)δ(y)δ(z).
  • Gauss identity (point source as divergence of a field) in Rd\mathbb{R}^dRd:
∇⋅(xSd−1 ∣x∣d)=δ(x) ,Sd−1=2πd/2Γ(d/2).\boxed{\ \ \nabla\cdot\left(\frac{\mathbf{x}}{S_{d-1}\,|\mathbf{x}|^{d}}\right)=\delta(\mathbf{x})\ \ },\qquad S_{d-1}=\frac{2\pi^{d/2}}{\Gamma(d/2)}. ∇⋅(Sd−1∣x∣dx)=δ(x) ,Sd−1=Γ(d/2)2πd/2.
  • Surface/curve constraints: for smooth f:Rd ⁣→ ⁣Rf:\mathbb{R}^d\!\to\!\mathbb{R}f:Rd→R,
∫Rd ⁣ ⁣δ(f(x)) g(x) dd ⁣x=∫f=0 ⁣ ⁣g(x)∥∇f(x)∥ dS.\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\!\! \delta\big(f(\mathbf{x})\big)\,g(\mathbf{x})\,d^d\!x=\int_{f=0}\!\! \frac{g(\mathbf{x})}{\|\nabla f(\mathbf{x})\|}\,dS.∫Rdδ(f(x))g(x)ddx=∫f=0∥∇f(x)∥g(x)dS.

6) “New stuff” (clean, testable reframings)​

(A) Measure-aware delta as a universal evaluation functional
Pick your underlying measure μ\muμ. Then δx0(μ)\delta^{(\mu)}_{x_0}δx0(μ) is the unique positive, normalized linear functional supported at {x0}\{x_0\}{x0} satisfying

∫φ δx0(μ) dμ=φ(x0),\int \varphi\,\delta^{(\mu)}_{x_0}\,d\mu=\varphi(x_0),∫φδx0(μ)dμ=φ(x0),
which makes plain why a lattice Kronecker delta and the continuum Dirac delta are the same concept in different measures. Prediction (useful rule-of-thumb): every lattice-to-continuum limit carries a factor of the cell volume.

(B) Delta as the identity of convolution algebras
On any locally compact abelian group GGG with Haar measure dμd\mudμ,

δe∗f=f∗δe=f,\delta_e * f = f * \delta_e = f,δe∗f=f∗δe=f,
so δe\delta_eδe (at the identity eee) is structurally enforced by symmetry alone. This viewpoint extends all the standard formulas to tori, lattices, and ppp-adics without re-deriving case by case.

(C) Delta via short-time semigroups (operator calculus)
Let HHH be a positive generator with heat kernel e−tHe^{-tH}e−tH. Then in distributional sense

δ=lim⁡t↓0e−tH andδ(H−E)=12π∫−∞∞eis(H−E) ds,\boxed{\ \ \delta = \lim_{t\downarrow 0} e^{-tH}\ \ } \quad\text{and}\quad\delta(H-E) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{is(H-E)}\,ds, δ=t↓0lime−tH andδ(H−E)=2π1∫−∞∞eis(H−E)ds,
which ties “delta of an operator” to experimentally accessible propagators. Falsifier: compute ρ(E)=Tr⁡ δ(H−E)\rho(E)=\operatorname{Tr}\,\delta(H-E)ρ(E)=Trδ(H−E) two ways (KPM vs resolvent) and match.

(D) Delta curvature identity on manifolds
On a Riemannian manifold (M,g)(M,g)(M,g), the Green’s function GGG of the Laplace–Beltrami operator satisfies

−ΔgG(⋅,p)=δp−1Vol⁡(M)(compact M),-\Delta_g G(\cdot,p)=\delta_p - \frac{1}{\operatorname{Vol}(M)}\quad \text{(compact \(M\))},−ΔgG(⋅,p)=δp−Vol(M)1(compact M),
exhibiting the delta as a curvature-aware defect. This generalizes the ∇ ⁣⋅(x/∣x∣d)\nabla\!\cdot(\mathbf{x}/|\mathbf{x}|^d)∇⋅(x/∣x∣d) identity and is useful in QFT on curved backgrounds.

7) Quick “delta calculus” crib (for your article)​

∫δ(x−a) f(x) dx=f(a),δ(ax+b)=1∣a∣ δ ⁣(x+ba),δ(f(x))=∑kδ(x−xk)∣f′(xk)∣,f(xk)=0,∫δ′(x−a) f(x) dx=−f′(a),F{δ(n)}(k)=(ik)n,∫Rdδ(x−a) f(x) dd ⁣x=f(a),δ(Ax)=δ(x)∣det⁡A∣(A invertible).\begin{aligned}&\int \delta(x-a)\,f(x)\,dx = f(a),\qquad\delta(ax+b)=\frac{1}{|a|}\,\delta\!\left(x+\frac{b}{a}\right),\\[4pt]&\delta\big(f(x)\big)=\sum_{k}\frac{\delta(x-x_k)}{|f'(x_k)|},\quad f(x_k)=0,\\[4pt]&\int \delta'(x-a)\,f(x)\,dx = -f'(a),\qquad\mathcal{F}\{\delta^{(n)}\}(k)=(ik)^n,\\[4pt]&\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\delta(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{a})\,f(\mathbf{x})\,d^d\!x=f(\mathbf{a}),\\[4pt]&\delta(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x})=\frac{\delta(\mathbf{x})}{|\det \mathbf{A}|}\quad(\mathbf{A}\ \text{invertible}).\end{aligned}∫δ(x−a)f(x)dx=f(a),δ(ax+b)=∣a∣1δ(x+ab),δ(f(x))=k∑∣f′(xk)∣δ(x−xk),f(xk)=0,∫δ′(x−a)f(x)dx=−f′(a),F{δ(n)}(k)=(ik)n,∫Rdδ(x−a)f(x)ddx=f(a),δ(Ax)=∣detA∣δ(x)(A invertible).

8) Where the “function with value 1 at 0” picture​

If you tried f(0)=1,f(x≠0)=0f(0)=1, f(x\neq 0)=0f(0)=1,f(x=0)=0, then ∫f(x) dx=0\int f(x)\,dx=0∫f(x)dx=0, not 111. The distributional definition avoids this by not assigning pointwise values; it only defines the action on test functions (which is exactly what physics uses when you integrate against wavefunctions, fields, or Green’s kernels).


If you want, I can package this into a one-pager (PDF/TeX) with the measure-aware unification front and center, plus a small lattice→continuum example (Kronecker →\to→ Dirac via a δa\,\deltaaδ).
 
Lox99 said:
Here’s a compact, copy-paste-ready “delta kit” with a fresh, measure-aware angle you can drop into your Insight.
Your math is unreadable; please edit your post.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top