What exactly is Fisher's model (adaptation/evolution)

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomsecret
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Fisher's geometric model of adaptive evolution posits that adaptation primarily arises from the accumulation of numerous small mutations rather than fewer large mutations. This model is supported by experimental results involving the bacteriophage φ6, where fitness recovery was observed to occur in smaller steps following the introduction of a deleterious mutation. The study demonstrated that advantageous mutations of small effect are more prevalent and often compensatory, depending on the presence of deleterious mutations. These findings reinforce Fisher's prediction regarding the commonality of small-effect mutations in evolutionary processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fisher's geometric model
  • Basic knowledge of genetic drift and its effects on populations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of mutation and fitness in evolutionary biology
  • Knowledge of epistasis and its role in adaptive landscapes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Fisher's geometric model" in detail to grasp its implications in evolutionary biology
  • Explore the concept of "genetic drift" and its impact on small populations
  • Study "epistatic interactions" and how they influence mutation advantages
  • Investigate experimental methods used in evolutionary biology, particularly with bacteriophages
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for evolutionary biologists, geneticists, and researchers interested in the mechanisms of adaptation and mutation dynamics in populations.

tomsecret
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What exactly is "Fisher's model" (adaptation/evolution)

What is Fisher’s geometric model? Why are small changes more likely to contribute to adaptation
that larger ones? there's a pic of a sphere in my textbook that explains this but i still don't get it.. Is the idea simply that small changes will/can contribute more to adaptation becuase large changes can decrease fitness faster, --is that the basic idea? please explain..thanks!
 
Biology news on Phys.org


Fisher's geometric model of adaptive evolution argues that adaptive evolution should generally result from the substitution of many mutations of small effect because advantageous mutations of small effect should be more common than those of large effect. However, evidence for both evolution by small steps and for Fisher's model has been mixed. Here we report supporting results from a new experimental test of the model. We subjected the bacteriophage φ6 to intensified genetic drift in small populations and caused viral fitness to decline through the accumulation of a deleterious mutation. We then propagated the mutated virus at a range of larger population sizes and allowed fitness to recover by natural selection. Although fitness declined in one large step, it was usually recovered in smaller steps. More importantly, step size during recovery was smaller with decreasing size of the recovery population. These results confirm Fisher's main prediction that advantageous mutations of small effect should be more common. We also show that the advantageous mutations of small effect are compensatory mutations whose advantage is conditional (epistatic) on the presence of the deleterious mutation, in which case the adaptive landscape of φ6 is likely to be very rugged.

Genetics, Vol. 151, 921-927, March 1999, Copyright © 1999
Evolution by Small Steps and Rugged Landscapes in the RNA Virus φ6
Christina L. Burcha and Lin Chao
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K