What factor affects the rate of exponential decay in coupled pendulums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xlyndseyx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of two pendulums attached to the same horizontal string, one with a larger mass and the other with a smaller mass, both of equal length. When the larger pendulum is released, it causes the smaller pendulum to resonate. The key observation is that the rate of exponential decay of the larger pendulum is slower than if it were a standalone pendulum. This raises questions about energy transfer and damping, as one would expect energy loss due to the smaller pendulum absorbing some energy, converting it to heat. An experiment is described involving a 1-ounce weight and a 1/2-ounce weight, confirming the initial setup. The explanation for the slower decay rate is attributed to reduced friction in the resonating system, which minimizes systematic errors and leads to less energy loss compared to a single pendulum.
xlyndseyx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
You have 2 pendulums attached to the same piece of horizontal string.
One pendulum has a large mass, the other is small.
They are both of the same length.
The large pendulum is released from an amplitude and so the small pendulum resonates.
The rate of exponential decay of the large pendulum is much slower, than if it were a single pendulum connected to nothing else.
How and Why is this so?
Surely the rate of exponential decay of the large pendulum should be faster and the pendulum dampened, as when energy is transferred to the small mass pendulum, some is lost from the system as it is converted to heat?

HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rate of exponential decay of the large pendulum is much slower, than if it were a single pendulum connected to nothing else.
From whence does this info come? Did you do an experiment?
 
This is very interesting. Allow me to venture clarification of the setup: A 1 foot string is tacked to the end of my desk. At the end of that string I place a 1 ounce weight. At the middle of the string I place a 1/2 ounce weight.
I hold onto the 1 ounce weight and taughtly raise the string structure horizontally to the edge of my desk.
Then I let go and observe the motion of the weights as they swing down and pendulum.
Is this a fair description?
 
Yes they're experiment results, which had me puzzled for a while!
But then i figured...FRICTION!
the pendulums which were in resonance had less friction than the single pendulum on its own, therefore the systematic error was reduced and the rate exponential decay was less.
Thanks for the replys though!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top