What factor affects the rate of exponential decay in coupled pendulums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xlyndseyx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of two pendulums attached to the same horizontal string, one with a larger mass and the other with a smaller mass, both of equal length. When the larger pendulum is released, it causes the smaller pendulum to resonate. The key observation is that the rate of exponential decay of the larger pendulum is slower than if it were a standalone pendulum. This raises questions about energy transfer and damping, as one would expect energy loss due to the smaller pendulum absorbing some energy, converting it to heat. An experiment is described involving a 1-ounce weight and a 1/2-ounce weight, confirming the initial setup. The explanation for the slower decay rate is attributed to reduced friction in the resonating system, which minimizes systematic errors and leads to less energy loss compared to a single pendulum.
xlyndseyx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
You have 2 pendulums attached to the same piece of horizontal string.
One pendulum has a large mass, the other is small.
They are both of the same length.
The large pendulum is released from an amplitude and so the small pendulum resonates.
The rate of exponential decay of the large pendulum is much slower, than if it were a single pendulum connected to nothing else.
How and Why is this so?
Surely the rate of exponential decay of the large pendulum should be faster and the pendulum dampened, as when energy is transferred to the small mass pendulum, some is lost from the system as it is converted to heat?

HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rate of exponential decay of the large pendulum is much slower, than if it were a single pendulum connected to nothing else.
From whence does this info come? Did you do an experiment?
 
This is very interesting. Allow me to venture clarification of the setup: A 1 foot string is tacked to the end of my desk. At the end of that string I place a 1 ounce weight. At the middle of the string I place a 1/2 ounce weight.
I hold onto the 1 ounce weight and taughtly raise the string structure horizontally to the edge of my desk.
Then I let go and observe the motion of the weights as they swing down and pendulum.
Is this a fair description?
 
Yes they're experiment results, which had me puzzled for a while!
But then i figured...FRICTION!
the pendulums which were in resonance had less friction than the single pendulum on its own, therefore the systematic error was reduced and the rate exponential decay was less.
Thanks for the replys though!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top