What Factors Affect the Calculation of Poisson's Ratio from Rosette Gauge Data?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of Poisson's ratio from rosette gauge data requires precise measurements of strain in relation to wall thickness changes in steel pressure vessels. The discussion highlights that an average Poisson's ratio of 0.4 was obtained, which deviates from the standard value of 0.29 for steel. It emphasizes the importance of measuring the thickness of the wall rather than surface changes, as circumferential stretching is typically greater than axial stretching due to internal pressure. Accurate geometric considerations are essential for reliable strain measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poisson's ratio and its significance in material science.
  • Familiarity with rosette gauge strain measurement techniques.
  • Basic knowledge of geometry related to cylindrical structures.
  • Experience with analyzing strain data in pressure vessels.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of strain gauge measurement and calibration techniques.
  • Learn about the geometric relationships in cylindrical pressure vessels under stress.
  • Study the effects of internal pressure on material deformation in steel structures.
  • Explore advanced methods for calculating Poisson's ratio using finite element analysis (FEA) software.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, materials scientists, and structural analysts involved in the design and testing of pressure vessels will benefit from this discussion.

theone
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have some strain readings using a rosette gauge, but I want to know how to calculate the poissons ratio for the steel pressure vessel

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried Strain A/Strain B and got an average value of 0.4.
But the provided value for steel is around 0.29
 

Attachments

  • Untitled8.png
    Untitled8.png
    58.9 KB · Views: 557
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson's_ratio

It is not clear that your strain gauges are measuring the right thing. Indeed, from the diagram it is not clear what they are measuring at all.

But basically, you want to be measuring the thickness of the wall as a function of the wall being stretched. The diagram seems to be showing that you are measuring changes of the surface, and not measuring changes in the thickness.

The tank may be stretching circumferentially much more than axially. If it is much longer than its radius this is likely to be true. A little bit of geometry should give you a fair estimate of the relative forces and the relative amount of material that is stretching.
 
The measurements indicates that the material is stretching much more along the axis
of B, which is to be expected since the internal pressure on the container is pushing
the walls outwards. The hemispherical structures at the ends also accommodates the
expansion of the tank along its circumference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K