What Factors Influence the Habitability of Exoplanetary Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the factors influencing the habitability of exoplanetary systems, specifically examining the relationship between stellar properties and the classical habitable zone. Researchers used both measured stellar properties and evolutionary models to assess current habitability and found that results were consistent regardless of the method. They also explored the impact of giant planets on Earth-mass planets' orbits within the habitable zone. The conversation shifted towards the ethical implications of exploring alien biospheres, although this aspect was deemed off-topic. Ultimately, the thread concluded without a clear consensus on further discussion points.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603200

Authors: Barrie W Jones, P Nick Sleep, David R Underwood
Comments: Being refereed

We have used the measured properties of the stars in the known exoplanetary systems to estimate their present habitability, and compared the outcome with earlier work, where we used a stellar evolution model to determine habitability throughout the main-sequence phase. This is to see whether the results are sensitive to stellar properties. The stellar properties in both pieces of work have been used to determine the present location of the classical habitable zone (HZ). To establish habitability, we estimate the critical distances from the giant planet(s) within which an Earth-mass planet would suffer large orbital changes. We then evaluate the present habitability of each exoplanetary system by examining the penetration of these critical distances into the HZ. For the present population of exoplanetary systems the results are insensitive to whether the evolutionary stellar model is used or measured stellar properties.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Frankly my dear, I'm not sure what discussion you are asking for?
For their own good reasons, the monitors for this site keep warning me off for failing to supply sources for my opinions. I'm a satirist, unfortunately a lazy satirist. So I don't do sources.

Are you seeking to discuss the methodology of research into exoplanets?

Or, do you wish to discuss speculated possibilities for Earth-type worlds?

Perhaps you want to discuss how to sort out all the conflicting floods of data, unverified evidence and bogus claims?

My preference would be to debate the moral and ethical standards we need to consider for every Human endeavor. A whole lot of people are willing to rationalize genocide against alien biospheres for a quick buck.

However, that dispute does not seem to be cogent to this site.
 
r8chard said:
Are you seeking to discuss the methodology of research into exoplanets?

Or, do you wish to discuss speculated possibilities for Earth-type worlds?
I dare to assume that the OP doesn't know anymore, what exactly he wanted to discuss after more than ten years.
r8chard said:
My preference would be to debate the moral and ethical standards we need to consider for every Human endeavor. A whole lot of people are willing to rationalize genocide against alien biospheres for a quick buck.

However, that dispute does not seem to be cogent to this site.
Yep, that would be a discussion for someone's hairdresser.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes ExoExplorer and Bystander
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top