What happens to a ball thrown forward vs. backward in a moving train?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Transformati
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Train
AI Thread Summary
When a ball is thrown forward or backward in a moving train, both balls will land at the same distance from the thrower, assuming the train's speed is constant. This phenomenon is explained by Galilean relativity, which states that the motion of the train does not affect the relative motion of the balls. The forward throw behaves like it would in a stationary train, while the backward throw also lands at the same distance due to the train's constant speed. The discussion highlights the principles of motion and relativity as outlined by Galileo. Understanding these concepts clarifies the behavior of objects in a moving frame of reference.
Transformati
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Can someone answer this question? If I throw a ball forward and another one backward (opposite to the train's movement) in a moving train, do both balls land at an equal distance from the thrower? I suspect throwing a ball forward is the same as throwing it in a motionless train but what about the ball thrown backward - does it land within a shorter distance?

The speed of the train is constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the ball and the throw are the same, the ball will land at the same distance from the thrower.

As you mentioned yourself, there is no difference between a motionless train and one that is moving at constant speed (Galilean relativity).
 
  • Like
Likes Transformati
Thanks for the reply DrClaude. Right after my post I read an excerpt from Galileo Galilei's book and I understood how it works (in Galileo's case he was testing moving objects within a ship's hull).
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top